Snowy Rivers
Well-known member
Where is it being held ????
Making the decision to go with a roller cam was a wise one.Been a nothing few days lately.....
Sort of taking a break from thrashing on the cat...
Still doing planning and things....Just not getting dirty....
With summer winding down it is time to think about the engine build.
I dragged out the box of engine parts (Bearings and such) and going to get the engine block ready to drop the crankshaft in...
The crank is a nice used one I scored from the engine rebuilders supply over in Troutdale
Standard all the way.....Nothing fancy...Just a good stock 400 SBC crank.
Crank has been standing in the corner for some time now and is filthy.....
Need to wash that beast up and clean off all the dust and such....Flush out the oil passages and inspect all the journals.
400 SBC cranks are slightly different than a SBC 350 crank......Main journals are larger on the 400 at 2.650" as opposed to the 350 at 2.45" Rod journals are he same at 2.10"
Stroke on the 400 is 3.750" compared to the 350 at 3.48"
The 400 uses a shorter rod length at 5.565" than the 350 at 5.7"
The reasoning on the short rod has to do with the piston used.....The engineers did not want the piston pins into the ring package...... (Compression height and other tech stuff)
The shorter rod length does tend to add a bit more sideways pressure on the pistons as opposed to the longer 5.7" rods.
Not a big deal for an engine that will be running in the 4000/4500 RPM range MAXIMUM
The 400 SBC also has siamese cylinders bores . At 4.125" stock (We are at 4.155 oversize) there is no water flow between the cylinders due to the large bores.....
A pair of coolant passages (Peculiar to the 400) are in the block between the center cylinders on each side of center to allow trapped air or STEAM to escape to the heads......Also peculiar to the 400 are the matching holes in the heads...
We are using late model Vortec (1998 L31) heads on this build.....The heads have been drilled to match the "Steam holes" in the block....
Also the Vortec engines use a slightly different coolant bypass set up than the earlier engines.. (Gen1) We modified the RH head to match the bypass passage in the 400 block......We are using the earlier CCW rotating (Serpentine belt system) water pump that has the bypass hole on the RH side of the block (3 holes ) Gen 1 block
Using the later coolant bypass system has more hoses and the pump does not have a passage on the RH side.....The passage in the block must be plugged or it will dump coolant all over.....Many articles have been written on the subject.....Bottom line.....cOOLANT MUST circulate constantly through the block/heads to avoid steam pockets and over heating during warmup and any time the T STAT is closed......
So I decided on a combination of the two systems .......Also adding a small air bleed hole in the T STAT is a good idea to eliminate air locks during the coolant fill process.....1/16" to 1/8" hole in the outer part of the stat is all that is needed.
Some stats have a bleed hole with a little valve to do the same thing......
Bottom line......Getting all the different generations of "Mouse motor" parts to play well with each other can be an interesting experience...
IF A LATE WATER PUMP is used that does not have the extra hole on the PASSENGER SIDE of the pump where it bolts to the block MUST use the coolant bypass hose from the intake to the pump....And on the early blocks the bypass passage in the block must be tapped and plugged.
WHY AM I USING THE EARLY PUMP.???? The early serpentine pump has the 4 bolt flange to attach the fan clutch/pulley and the smaller fan sizes that fit the fan shroud all work....Pumps all move the same amount of coolant .....
Why are things different ??????
I can't find any real info on why GM changed things.....My feeling is they decided to cut machining costs ...Less passages to drill and such.....Rubber hose is cheap.....
But...What we have should work sweet......
Still lamenting on which intake manifold to get.....Vortec intakes have 8 bolts the go straight up and down....Not on an angle parallel to the ports as in past engines.
Several manufactures offer intakes for theVortec heads.....
Ah well......
I have the high capacity oil pan with windage tray and gates.....Will grab a high volume oil pump and the oil pickup that works with the pan
With all the issues surrounding cam failures in flat tappet hydraulic cams (Oil now has very little ZDDP) and the lifters available at mostly sourced off shore....JUNK
Waste a cam and its a tear down to clean up the mess....
Decided to go with a roller cam.....I am not happy about the price $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ but wasting a fresh engine is not gonna cut it..
Flat tappet cams have not been used in factory engines for a long time as the EPA required manufactures to guarantee the catalytic converters for 100,000 miles ....ZDDP and Phosphorous will kill a converter.....Hence the big reduction in the two additives that keep a flat tappet cam alive....
This is why roller lifters came into common use in the 90's and not just a high performance item.....
So my choice to go roller is pretty much made.....I can't afford the gamble......
A few things must be added to the mix.....A cam thrust button needs to be in the mix....Have decided to go with a Cloyes 9-221 aluminum cover with adjustable thrust button (Bearing type)
The rest of the timing set up....Pretty much standard roller chain...
Going to use a Marine cam 495/503 lift (Comp cams XM270HR)
We machined the heads (Valve guides) to allow more than stock lift......
The chosen cam has a rated power range of 1500- 5500
The lobe design is better suited to steady high RPM as opposed to the RPM of a street engine.....(That is the cam folks talking)
This cam in 406 inches will have a commanding presence....But be quite happy with a stock stall converter in the tranny.
So many things to consider when making a Franken mutt engine
When I get the engine out in a day or two I will get pics of things....
If the Crank isn't cracked, it should still be OK. Either weld it and machine it or machine it and press in a bushing. A competent automotive machine shop should make quick work out of it. It was likely a converter issue that damaged the register., either loose bolts or loose in the transmission, Ive even heard of of just let the converter snout rest on the un damaged part of the register by locating in on the bottom then tighten the TQ bolts, with good results.No worries.....400 is fine for a polish ....I have used 400 or 600 for a light polish....
WE HAVE OTHER ISSUES
After I posted last I was back in the shop and had the crank on the bench chasing the threads where the flex plate bolts on....All looks fine.....Decided to use a "Whip stick" and polish the pilot bore where the converter snout goes in.....
Got that cleaned out....Just a bit of crud from years of service.....Then the ugly truth came to light....
I had the shaft laying just right and the light was perfect to see a strange shadow in the pilot bore. ??????????
I grabbed a pen light and went snooping....OH !@#$%^ Got my finger in the bore and discovered a nasty groove worn in one side......
THIS IS ONLY CAUSED BY ONE THING.....Bad converter......A rebuilt converter that has the drive end snout replaced and was not concentric ....This causes the converter to wobble.....I had one of these one time that was so bad that the side mirrors on the truck shook when you rev'd the engine.
Took me a while to figure it out.....
I had rebuilt the tranny and so it was obvious that the issue was there.....Finally took the converter to a shop I worked at then and stuck it in a lathe....OMG THE COVERTER WOBBLED LIKE A BUTTON ON A CHIT HOUSE DOOR.
The rebuilder finally replaced the converter.....After much saber rattling......
Anyway....that worn out pilot bore is a deal breaker on the crank....It could be bore out and a sleeve installed....My lathe is not long enough to do it.....Paying a shop to do it is not worth the $$$$$
Fooling around with a 40 plus year old crank that has been beat this bad is not gonna happen on my watch....
I am not pleased at all.....But when you buy used parts....It can happen.....I watched the crank being taken from a complete engine......Had the bore been clean I would not have spotted the issue.....
Using this crank is like sitting on a damned bomb.....Failure will be very costly.......
At the moment I am looking at a Scat crank.......I have used these in the past and had very good results.....
A sad deal......but this stuff happens......
I have spent the $$$$ to be sure the block is good....Also had the Vortec heads checked completely....Rods all reworked and checked.....Spending the big $$$$ for a roller cam.....
Sticking this POS crank in the build.....NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO...
Gotta call Scat when they open and ask a couple ??????
Since I already have STD bearings I want a STD crank.....
A fresh zero time crank is a good thing.
If the crank did not have this issue I would use it....But to wear the pilot as much as it is on the one side (1/8") The amount of stress that has been placed on the crank is off in the ozones.....That amount of wear took a long time.....On an iron crank.....The next thing you will hear is a big BANG.....
Running at 4000 RPM plus for long periods .....although not extreme....Could break the camels back....
Will post more when I know more......
If you clean bare steel or cast parts with hot water it will dry before the rust can happenCrank is not cracked....Magged good.....40 year old shaft that has been wobbled around with a bad converter has been stressed far more than I am willing to gamble on....THE BENT PAPER CLIP THING YA KNOW....
Boring out the rear of the crank is no big deal....Clean it up and press in a sleeve....Cost more than it is worth......
A Forged steel crank...Different story....at least they are far more forgiving than an iron shaft.....
A silver lining to the dark cloud though.
I thought of going with a scat crank.....They make a 3.750" stroke crank with the proper sized main journals..
The catch....They balance them to use the 5.700" 350 rods and not the 5.565" 400 rods
I have a fresh set of the 400 rods and new pistons.....I do not want to scrap this stuff and start over....The pistons that fit the 5.700" rods use a different compression height when used with the 400 crank.....Much shorter piston.....
Decided to check other crank builders....Same story.....
The choices are limited......
Back to the Rebuilders service across town.....
I called and the guys says they had recently acquired a few 400 cranks....
We tool on over and take a peek.....
A really clean crank is in the front end of the 400 rack....Hmmmmm
I checked the pilot bore....GOOD AS NEW..
GOT THE MIC'S ON THE JOURNALS.....SWEEEEEEEEEET....All standard
It gets better.
I asked the guy where it came from.....Absolutely zero oily shelac on the crank....These guys do not clean the parts.
He told me that they got in a few short blocks that came from a shop that closed in the covid thing.....
The crank in question was a new old stock unit.....It was assembled....but never run.....
Just a stock crate short block......
So the good news is we now have a really nice crank.....I am going to polish the oil hole ports to be rid of the sharp edges....Then polish the journals a touch...
The pilot bore shows zero wear.....This crank was never buckled up to a tranny.....
A few pics
Worth mentioning.....I washed off the thick grease that had been applied to the journals....Washed off real good....Then hit the crank with 180F water at high pressure from the Landa washer.
The bright steel picked up a tiny rust skim ...Seen easily in the pics.....Happens quick too..
I sprayed the crank with Skunk oil so it will not rust more....Will taker care of the sharp edges of the oil holes and then polish the journals...
Roll of polish cloth be here in the morning..
Best part....$100 got this bad boy.......
I feel very good with getting this shaft for the build......The other one would likely be fine for a grocery getter....But I am not at all warm and fuzzy with it spinning high RPM for long stretches....
Fatigue in the crank can't be measured....Good today.....Bang tomorrow....
Rear shot of the pilot bores....I did not touch the bore other than wash with degreaser and hot water.....
The rust skim from the hot water really shows in the piccy (#1 MAIN)