Hey I am putting a jib-crane on the Thiokol this year, just because the tracks are so damn heavy. If you need to pop your tracks off and throw them in the truck, we can put them back on over there!I just looked it up..Wallowa lake.....
I would love to come.....
Will have to see what shakes....
Big issue with the 2100 and FrankenCat conversions of same ....is the size....Even with the tracks cut down to single 44" grousers ....The beast is 11' 4" wide.....Big boy....
Drop the tracks...Roll them up and load them on the trailer....Winch the cat on the trailer.....
A 102" wide trailer will haul the cat ...No sweat.....Cat is 92" center/center on the guide wheels.
Moving the cat ready to go is a pain...Permits and such....
Take into consideration the cam profile, static CR is one thing an dynamic CR is another. Tight Lobe centers and short duration can build a lot of cylinder pressure down low.A piccy of some of the new parts....I need to pick up the filter adapter (Bolts to block) at the post office.
I spent time gathering good hard data on the engine parts.
Piston dish.................................... 20cc
Piston in the hole.......................... .010"
Gasket thickness compressed....... .038"
Gasket volume and diameter (Calculator figures the thickness and diameter)
Bore size ...................................... 4.155"
Stroke........................................... 3.750"
Vortec head chamber size ........... 64cc
Being a bit more accurate is far better at getting a good accurate number
We are in the area of ................... 9.7:1
This should really wake up the 406 cubes
The factory 400 with stock bore and the 78cc heads was at 8.5:1
They were good on torque....but overall a turd...Considering 400 inches should do something.......
The Vortec heads with a much better cam and a touch more comp. than the L31 they came with...Plus 56 more cubes gonna do something me thinks....
L31 350 had 9.4:1:1 comp........
I am real pleased with the numbers.....
Gonna be exciting to see how the little beast runs
To tell the truth the 603 I had, the 250CI ford six was plenty and actually could have gotten by as a commuter rig with a lot less, Nixon put a 4 cylinder diesel in a Tucker with excellent results. A cummins 4bt turned up slightly would make more power than a stock big chevy and would get miles to the gallon instead of gallons to the mile. That Thiokol 603 I had with the six would burn 20 gallons going 15 miles, thats one reason I sold it and built the mini track van. Im getting ready to put a slightly turned up cummins b3.3 in a 1970 dodge pickup. At 3500# with a 700r4 comparable builds are reporting a combined 38 mpg. The 3.3 turned up a little makes 150hp and 400 tq, with the hp@ 2900 and the tq @ 1600 rpm. makes more power than the small block in it now. I also know you already got everything and you are committed to that as it would blow things up too much on your build. When you started it gas was $ 2.30 a gallon and now it $7.00 depending on where you live.BOAT DIESELS ARE FINE....
A lot of pleasure craft are powered with gasoline engines.
I agree...UP HILL ALL THE TIME....NO COAST
A snow cat may have a little lightening of the load at times...But more like a boat....Especially like the long time operating at high RPM.
Some of the 3700 LMC cats used 3208 diesels....Among other engines.....
Ah well....We gonna make do with what we got.
I think most currently manufactured snow cats are diesel powered.....
Another option is the cummins 3.3 they weigh 575# come in wood chippers etc. can easily make 150 hp and 400 tq, in a FJ they have more power than the original power plant and get in the high 30's for combined mileage. I got one that needs freshening for $1000.00 and plan to put it in a 1970 Dodge pickup I have along with a 700r4. @3500# its about the same weight as the FJ so I should realize similar results. It will be a full sized 1/2 ton truck with small block power that gets mpg in the high 30's. Like you I am getting long in the tooth but will have more time for projects in another year and a half when I retire. Also been gathering parts to to body swap a 1969 power wagon onto a 1998 Dodge 3500 chassis with a p pumped 24 valve. Im done hijacking your postThanks for the tip...
There is a local shop here in town that has done several 4BT conversions.....IIRC they did one in a Toyota LC (Older style)
That rig was a body off frame rebuild with different Axles, T case, transmission and GAWD knows what all else
A severe duty FJ40 1970's vintage
Turned out sweet.....But a spendy project.
Well I figure the cat is my last project ....At 71 and in failing health.....It's time to pass the torch....
Back in the early 80's I did a 3208 cat in the FORD F350 4x4.....Conversion.....Helluva project
After sitting the Cat engine in...We had to pick the front end off the dirt.
Put a 4 speed Allison tranny in the beast....Fella was hauling a big gooseneck trailer......The V8 kitty cat did a good job....
IIRC it was a 250 HP ....Gobs of torque.
Not to further hijack your thread. Do you have a suggestion for a better option for a transmission? I need an overdrive automatic with a lockup converter that can be run standalone behind the B3.3. I chose a 700r4 because there seems to be a lot of support like the small block Chevy, its simple to control it and I can get a adapter for the 3.3 to Chevy transmission bell housing and flywheel pattern, The truck will weigh 3500# and the engine will put out 150 hp @ 3000 and 400tq at 1600. I don't have a lot of experience with automatic transmissions. It needs a Chevy pattern and OD with lockup and be able to control it standalone without too much work or $$. its 2 wheel drive and won't tow with it, just a 1/2 ton truck that will be a daily driver that get close to 40 mpg.I know it is not polite to "Toss cold water on someones campfire"
The 700R4 trans is a pretty weak gearbox.....Even the later versions the 4L60E with all the updates and redesigns are still sketchy....
I was in the Auto tranny Bizz for many years and the 700R4 was what paid the bills for us...
They are fine in very light rigs.....Medium sized sedans and small vans.....GM installed them in 1/2 ton pickups and they installed them in the K5 Blazer 4x4 behind the 6.2 Diesel.
The internals are small and way too light for any hard use.....
The later 700R4 right before they renamed them and went electronic were the best of the crop.
The updates, service bulletins and other paperwork from GM was staggering during the early years.
A shelf 8' long stacked like a book shelf was what was needed to hold all the service bulletins and updates...
Yessss...The aftermarket has really stepped up to the bar and fixed a lot of the issues....Still, the components are tiny and you can only do so much with small parts..
IMHO I would use a TH400 BOX and a gear vendors OD behind that......If the rig is a 4x4 it gets a bit tougher to make stuff work due to the space required.
None of the Auto makers made/make a really good tranny... ( Overdrive boxes)
The TH 350 was pretty decent and with a shift kit was good.
The TH 400 was "Nearly bomb proof"
The Ford C6 was a stout box...Again a shift kit was needed to really make them top shelf
The Mopar 727 in stock trim was pretty lame....Shgift kits and a few goodies would get them up to par
Many customers would bitch after we put in a shift kit because of the firm shifts.....
The late Mopar stuff like the 48RFE and 68RFE keep many tranny shops in business....
My son in law has had the tranny in his 08 Dodge 6.7 rebuilt twice now and the cost is staggering.....
Every auto maker wants to brag about their BIG AZZ DIESEL ...But they never think much about the tranny..
The Allison is fairly decent.....Better than the Dodge boxes by light years.
Still I cringe when I think about the power that so many folks are trying to shove at these poor tranny's.....
The older Allison 4 speed boxes are good.....But for most applications they have way too much parasitic drag internally..
A good choice for a big snow cat with big power (Torque) Torque is what kills......
Clutches, sprags, planet sets, sun shells, all suffer when they are subjected to big torque...
Another area of issue....Hydraulic leaks in the valve body...Cross leaks at shaft seals and other places....
Poor oil pressure under heavy loads.....Clutches start slipping and it's all over pretty quick....
The engineers design stuff and then use their computers to tell them if the design will work....WRONG ANSWER
Build a test unit and let "Bubba and his brother in law" beat the thing.....When it fails....Figure out why and make it better...Do again.....When Bubba and his Bro have trouble destroying it...You are pretty close......
I have always been fairly civil with my rigs and not flogged things....A have torn up half a dozen 700R boxes behind the anemic 6.2 diesels.....Finally gave up and stuffed in a 400....
Granted...NO OD but the boxes live.......The difference in mileage will never pay for a couple fresh tranny's....Especially when they scatter all over the street..
Enough of my Rant.....Just my thoughts on the subject....