• Please be sure to read the rules and adhere to them. Some banned members have complained that they are not spammers. But they spammed us. Some even tried to redirect our members to other forums. Duh. Be smart. Read the rules and adhere to them and we will all get along just fine. Cheers. :beer: Link to the rules: https://www.forumsforums.com/threads/forum-rules-info.2974/

"Snowzilla": A Comprehensive Tucker 1643 Project...

We finished adding the plastic spiral hose wrap to the remaining hydraulic hoses we wanted to cover; the high pressure supply line to the six-way valve, and the return line to the hydraulic system remote fluid cooler. Also, the lines going from the orbitrol to the steering cylinder.

The next step was installing the front seats. But, first we needed to finish up the front rubber floor by using a rubberized sealant and caulking the rubber flooring material intersections where different pieces butt up against one another. We also needed to seal the locations where the hydraulic hoses penetrate the floor. Pics:

IMG_2482.jpeg


IMG_2475.jpeg


IMG_2474.jpeg


The original seats had some tears in the vinyl and they needed to be reupholstered. The shop I successfully used for years has become more expensive and less reliable; not a winning combination. They did the reupholstery on TUG’s seats, and while they looked great, the quality of their work was excellent and the price was okay, the stock Tucker seats weren’t as nice to begin with as the DMC seats in TUG. Costs have increased since TUG’s seats were done in 2021, and spending even the same money on the original Tucker seats seemed like a poor use of funds. Yes, new seats would be more expensive, but they’d be nicer and more comfortable, too. Much back-and forth with WBJ1, and he ordered a set of new seats and had them shipped to us. I ordered new seat sliders and when they arrived it was time to fabricate some mounting brackets and install the seats.

Scott and I talked about different ideas for mounting bracket designs. We also discussed how much we wanted to raise the seats off the floor, and how much front-to-back seat bottom cushion angle we wanted. WBJ1 had ordered the same seat brand and model we put in Thundercat; Corbeau GTS II. It’s not so much that these seats are the cat’s meow, but rather it’s very hard to find seats that fit in a Tucker with a “factory” six way blade and the valve's placement inside the cab. The plan had been to use the original seats, and knowing those fit okay, we pretty much installed the valve in the same place as Tucker did. That decision was now limiting what seats we could use.

With Thundercat, we had scrapped Tucker’s floor system entirely and started from scratch with our own design. Knowing the factory seats were headed for the dumpster, we cut off the factory seat mounting tabs welded to the frame. When it came time to mount the seats, we had freedom to mount them however we desired. But P-Z had the factory floor pieces, and we had left the factory mounting tabs in place. That meant our bracket design had to incorporate the factory installed mounting tabs and hole alignment. We had all the seat components on hand that had been originally installed on P-Z, so after taking some measurements we “knew” what parameters our brackets had to meet. Yes, the quotation marks around “knew" are leading up to something….

After determining our game plan, we cut pieces of angle and flat bar needed for the driver’s seat bracket configuration. Holes were drilled and then Scott tack welded the pieces together. That was fortuitous because when the brackets were put in position... the holes didn’t line up with the factory’s mounting holes at all. WTF? Yup, good old Tucker! It seems commonsensical one would want their seats parallel with the snowcat, yes? Not in Tucker’s world, it’s anything goes.

So then the problem became how can we mount the seats in the proper orientation and utilize the steel pieces we had already cut? The factory mounting tabs at the front had to be aggressively slotted; the left side tab hole moved forward by about 1/8” and the right side tab hole moved aft by about 1/8”. The bracket covers the holes, so an observer won’t see the manufacturing sloppiness. The seat hides most of the bracket in the rear so an observer can’t really see that the holes are not nicely centered in the pieces of flat bar, either.

So with new seats and new seat sliders in hand, one would think “Eazy-peazy, just bolt the sliders to the seats. I mean, how hard can it be, right”? Well… we’ve all heard of Murphy’s Law, but Murphy was an Irishman, and St Patrick’s Day is just around the corner…

The seat sliders have a rail that bolts to the seats, and another rail that bolts to the brackets that mount to the floor. There’s a spring-loaded locking bar that one actuates to move the seats fore and aft. One rail was too short for the seat mounting bolt locations, so we’ll use the other rail, even if we have to slot the hole a bit. That was my plan, and we did that. But upon getting the seats mounted in P-Z, we found my plan was flawed. The actuating bar was attached to the mounting brackets not the seats, so the bar protruded significantly with the seats slid back. It was a Homer Simpson “Doh moment”. I hate those….

So both seats were removed and everything was unbolted. But we still had the problem that the correct rail was too short to mount to the Corbeau seats using their mounting bolt hole locations. The issue then was what’s the best way to extend those rails. We searched through the available materials at Scott’s shop and the best option was to use short lengths of unistrut with the top portion removed. The modified unistrut looks like a U in cross section, with square corners at the bottom of the U. Scott used his TIG welder and welded the unistrut extensions autogenously. (That means fusion welding without using filler material.) I took the modified seat sliders home, media blasted them, and touched up the paint with some rattle can satin black. Then everything was reassembled and bolted into place. Murphy had fun with us….

Here are the seats installed and covered with plastic to protect them. (I need to get some pics with the plastic off for the full effect. I’ll get them for the next update.) We’re pleased with how it's coming together…. I didn't mention it above, but we re-dyed the steering wheel (bought used) and installed that along with the horn button.

IMG_2480.jpeg


IMG_2476.jpeg
 
Thanks for the kind words!

As promised, pics of the front seats without plastic coverings.

IMG_2512.jpeg


IMG_2511.jpeg


After the front seats were complete, we had to deal with the back. Much earlier in the project, we removed the center roll bar, what I refer to as the “bulkhead”, and installed a new roll bar of our own design that hugs the cab sides and roof. We also installed some support legs for the new roll bar. We had done almost the same thing with the Vail Cat when we re-cabbed it from a two door to a three door configuration, and with that machine we had made some upholstered cushions that attached to the rear of those support legs. I suggested that idea to WBJ1 and he liked it, so that was now the plan.

On the Vail Cat, Mrs Blackfoot and I did the rear upholstery. We used 1,000 denier Cordura fabric. Very heavy-duty stuff chosen for it’s qualities of strength and durability, and her sewing machine didn’t like it. Corbeau will sell you fabric that matches the seat material, but knowing they have you over a barrel, they charge an absurd price for it. That wouldn’t fly with WBJ1, so I looked for something that would work well and look good. I tried to find a fabric as close to the Corbeau fabric as I could, and also one Mrs. Blackfoot would be okay working with. I settled on a mildew, UV, and water resistant black fabric for a fraction of the Corbeau fabric's price. When it comes to sewing, Mrs Blackfoot is amazingly talented. A-Mazingly! And in so many different ways. One of her sewing machines does embroidery and I suggested using bright orange thread to embroider "Putri-Zilla” on the rear seat back cushions. She frowned, letting me know she didn’t think much of my idea, and that it wasn’t going to happen…. Most unfortunate, but I haven’t given up.

Tucker’s upholstery in the rear cabs of the XX43s I’ve owned has been “uninspired”, to put it politely. Put differently, it’s basically been done as cheaply as possible; in terms of fabric selection and execution. I KNOW we can do better, and I want to try. On the one hand, at this stage of the project the finish line is in sight, and the tendency is to sprint. But on so many aspects of this project we’ve sweated the details, and tried to do our very best. Doing less than our best now just isn’t right, so we won’t do it. I know: readers are thinking "Well, you certainly let your standards lapse on the color choice”, and I’d have to agree. That is, by far the biggest “woulda, shoulda, coulda” of the project….

While waiting for the fabric to arrive, Scott and I decided to use some leftover pieces of the rubber flooring material and cover the bottom of the fancy Weatherguard toolbox WBJ1 bought for P-Z. He didn’t ask us to do this, but it seemed like a good idea to protect the bottom, and it’s pretty easily done. We used three pieces and glued them to the toolbox. Scott used his Ironworker to punch holes in the rubber corresponding to the location of the mounting bolts so the rubber is flat across the bottom of the toolbox. The access door is hinged at the bottom, and there are chains on the ends of the door that prevent it from hanging freely. Those chains rattle quite a bit, and over time they would damage the powder coating on the inside of the box. We thought it would be nice to cover the chains to silence the rattling and protect the finish. Mrs. Blackfoot made some covers out of that same 1,000 denier Cordura fabric, and lined it with fleece on the inside. She did a beautiful job, so they fit tightly around the chains. In fact, to get the pieces of chain inside the covers, the technique was to use a short length of mig welding wire, push that through the sleeve and attach it to the end of the chain, and then pull the chain back through the sleeve. The covers add some stiffness to the chains, and they no longer rattle as the snowcat is driven.


IMG_2514 2.jpeg


It’s also time to start reassembling carriers. "Way back when" we removed all the idler and damper wheels, as well as the spindles from the carriers. We removed the seals from the idler and damper wheels to inspect the bearings and repack them prior to installing new seals. Well, to inspect a bearing you have to remove all the old grease and get it clean, which takes some time. After about half a dozen wheels, only a small percentage of the bearings were passing inspection. We decided, the heck with this, we’ll just replace 'em all; cones and races. If you call Tucker and order new bearings from them you won’t get new bearings with names like Timken, SKF, Koyo, or NSK. You’ll get no-name, made in China bearings. On the one hand spending money for high quality bearings usually makes a lot of sense. But on a long track Tucker with 12 damper wheels and 24 idler wheels, you’ve 72 tapered roller bearings. What that also means is that each bearing doesn’t support much weight and Tuckers are low speed vehicles. Those bearings will never see high RPMs. I did some Internet shopping and bought new bearings very reasonably. Yes, they too are no-name, made in China bearings, but we think the quality is more than adequate, and the money saved for WBJ1 is substantial. Packing wheel bearings by hand is messy and time consuming. We use a Lisle 34550 Bearing Packer which makes the job ridiculously faster.

Some time ago in a different thread, Sno-Drifter had recommended Lubriplate Low Temperature Grease. The Sno-Drifter endorsement carries a lot of weight with me, and I promptly bought a 35 pound pail of it (basically a five gallon bucket, but it’s not full). That’s what we’re using on P-Z. It's not cheap, and finding it in pail form (as opposed to grease gun cartridges) required I special order it.
 
fabulous, unmatched quality, well thought out, countless hours, benchmark of custom tuckers, etc etc etc I am in awe!

okay I may have undersold it a bit, very impressive amount of work, well done knuckleheads

and to mrs thundercat, she is amazing skilled craftswomen ( and quite smart ) and most men could not even begin to match her skills... and Knowledge
 
Last edited:
Black foot I have no experience with any thing on a snow cat how good are the seals on those bearing , would using marine bearing grease be of any value , or is that a waste , I don’t know what kind of load or RPM they turn , I am just curious
 
Black foot I have no experience with any thing on a snow cat how good are the seals on those bearing , would using marine bearing grease be of any value , or is that a waste , I don’t know what kind of load or RPM they turn , I am just curious
The Tucker idler wheel setup as far as bearings, seals, etc has evolved over the years, presumably getting better. But on my eighties vintage Tuckers they’re the same system. Seals are available from many different manufacturers, and of course at different price points. I buy seals from Tucker. They use a triple lip seal with a material designed for cold temperatures. From the label on the package Tucker gets them from Colonial Seal, Co. which sources them overseas (China?). Tucker’s price isn’t bad.

Tuckers really aren’t high speed machines. We’ve had Thundercat up to about 18 mph, and it's not very pleasant. The tracks have a lot of rotating mass, and at that speed they throw up a lot of snow. But for illustration purposes, 18 MPH equals 1,584 feet in a minute or 19,008 inches per minute. A Tucker idler wheel is about 14” in diameter, so the circumference is 43.98” Dividing 43.98 into 19,008 shows the idler wheel is rotating at 432 RPM. But that’s at top speed, and 10-12 MPH is more typical. At 12 MPH idler wheel RPM would be about 288. For comparison, a boat trailer tire size of 225/75/15 at 60 MPH would be spinning at about 713 RPM.

Getting back to the idler wheel/carrier setup, Tucker uses spindles that push into spindle tubes welded to the carriers. The spindles are 1.25” in diameter (from memory, so may not be correct) and are threaded on the end with a 1”-14 thread. They drill a hole in the threaded portion for a castle nut and cotter pin. But whereas a boat trailer axle has a larger diameter for the sealing surface on the inside of the axle spindle, and the outside end of the hub has no seal, but rather a cap to keep the grease in, Tucker uses what they call “ring seals” on the spindles. A ring seal is basically a spacer that has roughly a 1 3/4” OD, a slightly larger than 1 1/4” ID with the ID machined for an O-ring to seal against the spindle. The idler wheel’s seals ride on the OD of the ring seals. There are also large flat washers that are installed on the inside and outside of the idler wheels. If this is confusing, I understand. It makes more sense with a simple photo, but I don’t have one. In terms of assembly sequence on the axle spindle, it goes: large flat washer with big ID, ring seal, idler wheel assembled with tapered roller bearings and seals, ring seal, large flat washer with small ID, castle nut and cotter pin. But honestly, the whole design is ripe for improvement. One thing about Tucker is cost (as-in cheap) is a major driving force in what they do.

It’s interesting you mention marine wheel bearing grease as that is what I was using before Sno-Drifter’s recommendation of Lubriplate Low Temperature Grease. If you recall the EF Hutton advertising campaign back in the eighties: “When EF Hutton talks, people listen”, you’ve got a good idea of my respect for what Sno-Drifter says. He’s "been there-done that”, though he doesn't appear to have too many battle scars from his experiences.
 
Here are some recent pics I had to add visuals.

The blue idler uses the newer short spindle with cap which eliminates a spacer and washer. The other ones are older style with spacers and washers on both sides.

Spoke with Track Inc VT about upgrading to the oring spacers. Thinking was for the hobbyists not worth the investment and time to switch. They also said Tucker did not install the seals backwards. Legend says Bill Cook flipped the seals to make the grease force into the bearing and reduce the cavity for water and grease.

The newest spindle cap setup is much better.

100% Lubriplate grease. Everything about it is better even when it gets on you!
1477B1B6-5FE7-414E-8C19-0EA9C36A8011.jpeg
E56AC5E0-9D0A-4255-8FB4-115C9928CE44.jpeg
AE4F169D-393B-4988-8587-F0DE5732105F.jpeg
06749600-89E1-4746-B6B7-7D4E587550A3.jpeg
712512CC-5CF6-4A64-9FF0-0F2A70255684.jpeg
1FF1FA98-835C-4F02-ADCB-0FE3468A14FD.jpeg
FA696E03-74A7-467B-820B-6E0441B99587.jpeg
 
Thanks for the kind words!

As promised, pics of the front seats without plastic coverings.

View attachment 162999

View attachment 163000

After the front seats were complete, we had to deal with the back. Much earlier in the project, we removed the center roll bar, what I refer to as the “bulkhead”, and installed a new roll bar of our own design that hugs the cab sides and roof. We also installed some support legs for the new roll bar. We had done almost the same thing with the Vail Cat when we re-cabbed it from a two door to a three door configuration, and with that machine we had made some upholstered cushions that attached to the rear of those support legs. I suggested that idea to WBJ1 and he liked it, so that was now the plan.

On the Vail Cat, Mrs Blackfoot and I did the rear upholstery. We used 1,000 denier Cordura fabric. Very heavy-duty stuff chosen for it’s qualities of strength and durability, and her sewing machine didn’t like it. Corbeau will sell you fabric that matches the seat material, but knowing they have you over a barrel, they charge an absurd price for it. That wouldn’t fly with WBJ1, so I looked for something that would work well and look good. I tried to find a fabric as close to the Corbeau fabric as I could, and also one Mrs. Blackfoot would be okay working with. I settled on a mildew, UV, and water resistant black fabric for a fraction of the Corbeau fabric's price. When it comes to sewing, Mrs Blackfoot is amazingly talented. A-Mazingly! And in so many different ways. One of her sewing machines does embroidery and I suggested using bright orange thread to embroider "Putri-Zilla” on the rear seat back cushions. She frowned, letting me know she didn’t think much of my idea, and that it wasn’t going to happen…. Most unfortunate, but I haven’t given up.

Tucker’s upholstery in the rear cabs of the XX43s I’ve owned has been “uninspired”, to put it politely. Put differently, it’s basically been done as cheaply as possible; in terms of fabric selection and execution. I KNOW we can do better, and I want to try. On the one hand, at this stage of the project the finish line is in sight, and the tendency is to sprint. But on so many aspects of this project we’ve sweated the details, and tried to do our very best. Doing less than our best now just isn’t right, so we won’t do it. I know: readers are thinking "Well, you certainly let your standards lapse on the color choice”, and I’d have to agree. That is, by far the biggest “woulda, shoulda, coulda” of the project….

While waiting for the fabric to arrive, Scott and I decided to use some leftover pieces of the rubber flooring material and cover the bottom of the fancy Weatherguard toolbox WBJ1 bought for P-Z. He didn’t ask us to do this, but it seemed like a good idea to protect the bottom, and it’s pretty easily done. We used three pieces and glued them to the toolbox. Scott used his Ironworker to punch holes in the rubber corresponding to the location of the mounting bolts so the rubber is flat across the bottom of the toolbox. The access door is hinged at the bottom, and there are chains on the ends of the door that prevent it from hanging freely. Those chains rattle quite a bit, and over time they would damage the powder coating on the inside of the box. We thought it would be nice to cover the chains to silence the rattling and protect the finish. Mrs. Blackfoot made some covers out of that same 1,000 denier Cordura fabric, and lined it with fleece on the inside. She did a beautiful job, so they fit tightly around the chains. In fact, to get the pieces of chain inside the covers, the technique was to use a short length of mig welding wire, push that through the sleeve and attach it to the end of the chain, and then pull the chain back through the sleeve. The covers add some stiffness to the chains, and they no longer rattle as the snowcat is driven.


View attachment 163002

It’s also time to start reassembling carriers. "Way back when" we removed all the idler and damper wheels, as well as the spindles from the carriers. We removed the seals from the idler and damper wheels to inspect the bearings and repack them prior to installing new seals. Well, to inspect a bearing you have to remove all the old grease and get it clean, which takes some time. After about half a dozen wheels, only a small percentage of the bearings were passing inspection. We decided, the heck with this, we’ll just replace 'em all; cones and races. If you call Tucker and order new bearings from them you won’t get new bearings with names like Timken, SKF, Koyo, or NSK. You’ll get no-name, made in China bearings. On the one hand spending money for high quality bearings usually makes a lot of sense. But on a long track Tucker with 12 damper wheels and 24 idler wheels, you’ve 72 tapered roller bearings. What that also means is that each bearing doesn’t support much weight and Tuckers are low speed vehicles. Those bearings will never see high RPMs. I did some Internet shopping and bought new bearings very reasonably. Yes, they too are no-name, made in China bearings, but we think the quality is more than adequate, and the money saved for WBJ1 is substantial. Packing wheel bearings by hand is messy and time consuming. We use a Lisle 34550 Bearing Packer which makes the job ridiculously faster.

Some time ago in a different thread, Sno-Drifter had recommended Lubriplate Low Temperature Grease. The Sno-Drifter endorsement carries a lot of weight with me, and I promptly bought a 35 pound pail of it (basically a five gallon bucket, but it’s not full). That’s what we’re using on P-Z. It's not cheap, and finding it in pail form (as opposed to grease gun cartridges) required I special order it.
I also decided to replace all race, bearings, seals and seal races on my 1544 carriers. I learned from an aircraft mechanic how to hand pack bearings for the club Cessna 150 wheel bearings, and we didn’t have neoprene gloves back then. Even with gloves the hands get sore. Too late for a Bearing Packer this time. Next time.
 
The Tucker idler wheel setup as far as bearings, seals, etc has evolved over the years, presumably getting better. But on my eighties vintage Tuckers they’re the same system. Seals are available from many different manufacturers, and of course at different price points. I buy seals from Tucker. They use a triple lip seal with a material designed for cold temperatures. From the label on the package Tucker gets them from Colonial Seal, Co. which sources them overseas (China?). Tucker’s price isn’t bad.

Tuckers really aren’t high speed machines. We’ve had Thundercat up to about 18 mph, and it's not very pleasant. The tracks have a lot of rotating mass, and at that speed they throw up a lot of snow. But for illustration purposes, 18 MPH equals 1,584 feet in a minute or 19,008 inches per minute. A Tucker idler wheel is about 14” in diameter, so the circumference is 43.98” Dividing 43.98 into 19,008 shows the idler wheel is rotating at 432 RPM. But that’s at top speed, and 10-12 MPH is more typical. At 12 MPH idler wheel RPM would be about 288. For comparison, a boat trailer tire size of 225/75/15 at 60 MPH would be spinning at about 713 RPM.

Getting back to the idler wheel/carrier setup, Tucker uses spindles that push into spindle tubes welded to the carriers. The spindles are 1.25” in diameter (from memory, so may not be correct) and are threaded on the end with a 1”-14 thread. They drill a hole in the threaded portion for a castle nut and cotter pin. But whereas a boat trailer axle has a larger diameter for the sealing surface on the inside of the axle spindle, and the outside end of the hub has no seal, but rather a cap to keep the grease in, Tucker uses what they call “ring seals” on the spindles. A ring seal is basically a spacer that has roughly a 1 3/4” OD, a slightly larger than 1 1/4” ID with the ID machined for an O-ring to seal against the spindle. The idler wheel’s seals ride on the OD of the ring seals. There are also large flat washers that are installed on the inside and outside of the idler wheels. If this is confusing, I understand. It makes more sense with a simple photo, but I don’t have one. In terms of assembly sequence on the axle spindle, it goes: large flat washer with big ID, ring seal, idler wheel assembled with tapered roller bearings and seals, ring seal, large flat washer with small ID, castle nut and cotter pin. But honestly, the whole design is ripe for improvement. One thing about Tucker is cost (as-in cheap) is a major driving force in what they do.

It’s interesting you mention marine wheel bearing grease as that is what I was using before Sno-Drifter’s recommendation of Lubriplate Low Temperature Grease. If you recall the EF Hutton advertising campaign back in the eighties: “When EF Hutton talks, people listen”, you’ve got a good idea of my respect for what Sno-Drifter says. He’s "been there-done that”, though he doesn't appear to have too many battle scars from his experiences.
I asked Tucker about the thin washers and was told they are obsolete and unavailable. I can’t really see or understand what good those thin washers do after building snowmobiles for the last 40 years and comparing the work environment.
 
They keep the frozen hard grease from pushing the seals out during greasing.

The spacers sit inside. Nut on front prob helps hold. Back would be the one that blows out you won’t see.

The new spindles eliminate the washers which is prob why. Some dealers sell have.
 
that’s what I like about forums like this , very good points , makes a lot of cents to me
thank you guy’s
 
I’m still not convinced those inner and outer washers running next to the seals is a solution.
If the seal is pushed out against the washer, the seal has a choice of turning with the wheel, or staying against the washer and turning in the seal grove in the wheel. Which is not good for the wheel and the seal function is gone.
The seals in my old style wheels ((14 of them) have a very shallow groove to live in. I can see where they probably fall out on a regular basis. I don’t have a solution for then.
But the new wheels have really deep seal area and trailer Bearing Buddies are a possible solution.
Just have to keep an eye on the wheels for now.
 
If installed correctly the washers don’t touch the hub and are fixed against the spacers. The washers also help to keep Sno and debris out. For the a few hundred miles a year none of this matter for the use on this forum in general.

If you grease end of season and often you don’t need seals.

Bearing buddies are not a friend on Sno cats or trailers for that matter and only address one side of the equation. Saw one spit off a trailer in front of me today and dollars to donuts rear bearing failure is most common which bearing buddies don’t address in most applications.

My Tucker came with a bunch in spare parts none were on the machine. New England is full of cheap yakees and the grease gun is a better following.

Tucker has a higher service cost than twin tracks of similar vintage. Maybe the perceived value was the value for a solution they solved nothing.

Good A6 bearings and Lubriplate for the win!

Seals push out from water and shitty grease.
 
Last edited:
Here are some recent pics I had to add visuals.

The blue idler uses the newer short spindle with cap which eliminates a spacer and washer. The other ones are older style with spacers and washers on both sides.

Spoke with Track Inc VT about upgrading to the oring spacers. Thinking was for the hobbyists not worth the investment and time to switch. They also said Tucker did not install the seals backwards. Legend says Bill Cook flipped the seals to make the grease force into the bearing and reduce the cavity for water and grease.

The newest spindle cap setup is much better.

100% Lubriplate grease. Everything about it is better even when it gets on you!
View attachment 163106View attachment 163107View attachment 163108View attachment 163109View attachment 163110View attachment 163111View attachment 163112
Track Addict,

Thanks for the thorough explanation on the improved spindle setup and the pics. Very helpful!

I’m a little bit confused, though. As I understand it, the new shortened spindle eliminates the front (outside) ring seal and large diameter washer, but still uses a ring seal in back, and presumably the larger hole flat washer?

If that’s the case, it would seem one could take their old spindles, cut them down to the proper length and re-drill the hole that secures them to the spindle tube with the through-bolt and nut.Then get some appropriately sized trailer hub dust caps.

Alternatively, one could machine new spindles that incorporate a collar with the same OD as the ring seal. The idler wheel's inside seal would ride on that surface, and the inside ring seal and flat washer could be eliminated.

I haven’t bought ring seals lately, but from memory I think they were something like $9 each. We haven’t cleaned and inspected all of P-Z’s spindles, ring seals and washers, but if ring seals are needed, the cost-effective solution may be to shorten the spindles and go the dust cap route…. Of course we've installed all new seals on both the inside and outside wheel locations.
 
I didn’t take mine off to check but I thought he said the spindle has a groove in it for the oring eliminating the spacer with the oring. Guess is it’s easier to turn a spindle groove that a groove on the ID. I could have got that wrong. Mine is coming apart again soon so will confirm.

The front seal and spader is eliminated and if comes with a new shorter nut and threads. The cap fits super tight so grease can only flow one way out the back seal.

Possibly the big washer was still used to keep the seal from blowing out the baxk. Guess it depends on the grease used, old grease stiffness temp flow etc.

If you use Lubriplate it flows nice all temps so would be non issue. Other crappy grease may be problematic with out a washer to retain seals especially with pneumatic or electric guns.
 
And the idler wheel casting is also different from what I am seeing.
Track Addict,

Thank you for the additional information. Back in the day with manual lathes I’d definitely say it’s easier to machine an external O-ring groove on the spindle, rather than an internal O-ring groove on a ring seal. But today, with the vast majority of lathes sold being computer controlled, I’m not so sure. The downside of cutting the external O-ring groove in the spindle is you’ve created a weak spot. Why is that a good thing?

I'm curious as to the difference(s) in the idler wheel casting. Please post pics, and dimensions, when you remove a new style idler wheel. That would be very helpful!!!

When we were reassembling the carriers on Thundercat, we found the length of the spindles were not consistent… at all. That created problems as on some spindles we couldn’t adjust the wheel bearings properly and insert the cotter pin in the castle nut. We ended up re-machining all the castle nuts by reducing them in thickness by .120 (IIRC). It shouldn’t be a problem to take more off on P-Z's castle nuts, if required.
 
I’ve previously expressed my opinion that changing track belting is just not a fun job at all, and doing it on the big table at Scott’s shop makes the task more tolerable. Sure enough, those comments have now come back to haunt us.... Scott has a project at the shop that has moved at a glacial pace, and it's occupied one of the two bays in the shop for something like four months. As we started the process of changing out belts, part of that project had taken over the big table. I had no reason to believe that would move quickly, so… I suggested we use the deck over trailer's deck as our new work surface for track work.

We're going to be removing all 16 belts from P-Z, Thundercat and the 1544. That adds up to 48 belts and 348 grousers. It is literally thousands of nuts and bolts, so it makes sense to try and do this as efficiently as possible, and I thought I'd share the techniques we’re using. We lay the track out on the flat trailer deck with about 1/3 of the track’s width hanging over the edge. This allows topside access to the nuts with an impact wrench and socket, and you can easily position your other hand holding a wrench on the bolt head underneath. We highly recommend you wear quality leather gloves. They act to absorb some of the shock of the impact wrench’s hammering, and they’ll protect your hand if it gets pinched between the wrench and a grouser. (Yeah. Been there, done that.) We do all the grousers on the outside half of the track, then remove the backing plates, drive any remaining bolts through the rubber belting, and roll the individual belts up and set them aside. Then we roll the track up, spin it around and then lay the track out again - exposing the other side of the grousers. Then hang that other 1/3 of the track over the edge, and get back at it.

At this point I think we’ve settled on the optimal wrench setup for the bolt head. When we started, I was using a combination wrench with a six point box end, and Scott was using a 12-point box end wrench. The combination wrench is a bit on the short side. I searched online for a six-point box end wrench, but have not been able to find one, other than ratcheting versions. We discussed the idea of taking a six point socket and grinding off the bottom of the socket, the portion that is chamfered, and then welding a piece of flat bar or round rod to the side of the socket. That also involved cutting the socket down in length. The reason for that is the top of the grouser is bent to an acute angle and that limits access to the bolt head. The first socket Scott cut down was a 1/2” drive socket so it could be used on both ends. That lasted for about 1 1/2 tracks worth of bolts before it catastrophically failed. The second version is a 1/4” drive six-point socket, which didn't need to be reduced in height. That’s working well so far, but I’d like to have more experience with it before giving the BFT “Seal of Approval” to the concept. I’m still using the six-point combination wrench and I try and hold the box end on the bolt head, and let the other end rotate until it contacts a fixed object to prevent it from turning (that's usually an adjacent grouser).

Pics of the special wrench.

IMG_2568.jpeg


IMG_2569.jpeg


Working hard with no breaks, we're able to remove all the grousers from one complete long track in about an hour. The first night we did three tracks... and fortunately ran out of time. I phrased it that way because by then the hands were sore and the back was sore. I wondered if it was just me, but Scott confirmed his hands and back were sore as well.

When it comes to hardware to secure the grousers to the backing plates, I’ve decided Grade 8, carbon steel fasteners are the way to go. Tucker recommends only 20 foot pounds of torque on the fasteners, so buying Grade 8 seems unnecessary. Okay, here's why I like Grade 8:

Track bolts in our opinion are one-time use fasteners. They will very likely last the life of the track belts and we’re changing out belts that are as much as 43 years old. Rust/corrosion on the nuts and bolts are factors that make it more difficult to remove the fasteners. Grade 8 bolts and nuts have a slightly higher Rockwell hardness than Grade 5, or significantly more than Grade 2. What that translates to is the bolt head and nut hold their shape better through the somewhat brutal hammering action of the impact wrench. Why does that matter? Probably 60% of the time when a nut has been removed, a slight tap of the impact socket will dislodge the nut and you're ready for the next one. But sometimes, and this happens when there is more hammering of the impact wrench involved, by the time you get the nut off, it is firmly stuck in the impact socket, and it’s not easy to remove it. Now you’re wasting time trying to get the recalcitrant nut out of the impact socket so you can get back to productive work. It’s annoying….

The Tucker grouser design has changed over the years and all of these grousers use bolts with their heads welded to the grouser for the two inside fastener locations, rather than just bolts that are easily accessed for installation or removal. With about 20% of P-Z’s grousers, one of those inside bolts has broken. Those will be a chore to repair. We call the problematic nuts and broken bolts “Chad nuts” and “Chad bolts” - because they make a lot of extra work for us….
 
Rob Miller if I recall used a template with plasma and cut tombstones out to access those middle bolts.

I have a few grousers on mine that like like the others but the gauge of the steel is thinner. Those constantly are bending on the outside. Not sure if aftermarket or a cheap tucker batch. Will swap some day.
 
I used just two belts per track on my rebuild. I also tack welded every head after it was tight. Any inboard covered bolts that needed replacing I used a zip cutter to cut and peal back the “trailing” half of the grouser to get at the head of the bolt with the zip cutter. After installing a new bolt, and the bolted to the track, I bend/pound the bent plate back into position and weld. Then reach in and tack weld the head of the bolt.
E718396F-CC9C-4683-81F5-360E9460C185.jpeg
 
fun bit of nothing for the thread....

"It’s interesting you mention marine wheel bearing grease as that is what I was using before Sno-Drifter’s recommendation of Lubriplate Low Temperature Grease. If you recall the EF Hutton advertising campaign back in the eighties: “When EF Hutton talks, people listen”, you’ve got a good idea of my respect for what Sno-Drifter says. He’s "been there-done that”, though he doesn't appear to have too many battle scars from his experiences."

Knowing and respecting Drifter..... I Stopped at a distributor to get some Grey and Black packaged grease..... the owner was there and was wondering what I was greasing as I was wanting so many tubes..... I pointed to my transporter and said a TUCKER........ He said oh that will work for tapered bearings....... I said no, I am greasing double rollers and he promptly asked what year tucker i had...... he spent many years on and under them on local ski facilities

everyone has opinions on grease, lubricants and fuel. When I was done hearing his sales pitch about rollers versus tapers and then his data from the mining industry I bought both BLue and Grey and Black cartridges. I will report back

in regards to caps and seals and nuts.

there are caps that fit over the long nuts. they look like the ones on my gear lubed 7K trailer axle hubs. little rubber grommet in center.

it is a common practice in the midwest to put the seals in backwards and pump low viscosity grease in after every use while hubs are warm. keep in mind these tuckers are seeing 400 hrs of operation per winter and heavily loaded and dragging massive snow filled drags at full throttle in sub zero weather. Water happily comes out every time I do it. If i push a seal out it is because the hub is in distress and or failing from fatigue. three 10-24 RH machine screws fixes that problem.

$.02 of a 50 hour machine operator
 
Track work is certainly not a big joy.....When it is needed it just has to be done.

Tearing the tracks apart on my 2100 is nothing short of brutal.....7/16" fine thread bolts with the swage lock nuts....Rusted up really well after many years

The 57" tracks each weigh about 1200 pounds or more....

A 6 point box end in the grouser to hold the nuts and the 3/4" impact gun on the bolt heads.....They either come off or break with the big rattle wrench.....NO FUN....Yessssss on the good "HAND SHOES"

I am not looking forward to building the new tracks....Going to use single width grousers at 44" instead of the staggered 57"

Gods speed on your tracks.....

Good safety glasses too...I been hit by a few bolts that broke off and flew up and hit me in the face......
 
Thanks for the replies and pics....

Our objective is a nice, clean repair that's essentially undetectable. I think that’s what both Rob Miller and YDPC were after as well. I have seen some Tuckers listed for sale that have had the same issue, and the “repaired” grousers had the tombstones very roughly hacked out - and not welded back in after the broken bolt was replaced. They looked horrible, and one couldn’t help but look at that level of “workmanship”… and extrapolate it to the rest of the snowcat. At that point I lost all interest in buying the machine.

What we decided to do was along the lines of YDPC’s method. We take an angle grinder and cutoff wheel, and make a vertical cut in the grouser’s supporting angle plate, just inside of where the bolt is. Then another cut along the grouser’s face that intersects that supporting angle plate. Next, we pry the cut section of the angle plate back to expose the welded bolt head. At that point Scott uses his acetylene torch to remove the welded portions of the bolt head. Then it’s driving the broken bolt out, inserting a new bolt, welding the bolt head to the grouser. What’s left to do now is bend the free end of the supporting plate back into position and weld up all the cuts. A little weld cleanup with an angle grinder and it’s done. For increased strength and weld penetration, Scott used his stick welder for all the grouser welding. I thought it was going to be more of a process than it turned out to be. It actually went considerably faster than I expected it to. When does that ever happen?

Pics:

The cut and bent angle supporting plate with the broken bolt removed.

IMG_2605.jpeg


New bolt welded in position with the cuts welded.

IMG_2639.jpeg


The repaired grouser.

IMG_2638.jpeg


YDPC,

I’ve seen a few Tuckers with a two-belt vs four-belt setup. A number of years ago I wondered about that in terms of pros and cons and I was told a big reason for the four-belt setup is that it has better side hill holding ability. Just an FYI… I don’t know if that’s true, or how much of a difference it makes.

Snowy,

Your point about safety glasses hit home. Half a lifetime ago I had a job running a turret lathe and one day I was making a part that had a tapped hole in the end. The tap broke and part of it came up and shattered the left lens of the safety glasses I was wearing. There is zero doubt that without the safety glasses I would have lost the eye. Over the years since, I’ve thought about that, and wondered how different my life would have been had I not been wearing safety glasses. After returning to college and graduating, I went into the USAF for about 8 1/2 years, and that led to a career in aviation. Neither would have been possible….
 
the general consensus on the 2 belt and multiple belt set up is a ford vs chevy debate.

two points to ponder are:
when a tucker is in a turn think of the grousers as a fan. like a tire there is a twisting effect.
When a grouser encounters and obstacle they need to twist upwards on the obstacle side. downward on the other side.

I feel tucker never used singles as they don't give in either of the scenarios above.

Mount a go pro or similar and cross a ditch or go over a log and you will see the grousers fan out and retract. clubs using tuckers as pulling units often double up the outside belts in an effort to reduce grouser breakage due to side loading such as working the edges of a groomed trail or plow furlough along a roadway. if the inside goes up over or onto an obstacle the other side needs to go out or down, if it cant strecth, something needs to bend as the entire carrier is rigid or fixed.

there are the two replacement track systems that are not OEM tucker both use single wide belts. hans hall and mtn Equipment.
 
No significant progress to report, but there is a name change from Putri-Zilla….

Folks who have followed this thread from the beginning may remember the original name given to this Tucker Sno-Cat project: Snow Zilla. That was a great name, but after The Infamous WBJ1 decided he wanted it painted a very ugly shade of green, Snow Zilla was no longer appropriate. For a time, I referred to the color as “pea soup green”, but “baby shit green” won out. At some point I started calling it Putri-Zilla; in honor of the putrid color.

After a recent private text exchange, it’s been decided to call it TUGS. (TUG (singular) was the name of a DMC 1450 project that Scott and I sold earlier this year.) TUGS (plural) is also an acronym, and it’s short for The Ugly Green Snowcat. It seems spot-on accurate.
 
I just remembered I took a picture of the way I gained access to those covered grouser bolts. I do it slightly differently that posted above. I make one horizontal cut that takes off the head of the bolt.
Then I fold the edge up enough to get a bolt back into the hole, bend the fold back down, and as I touches the grouser again I weld it down. That way I only have one cut and the bend seems to work down better as I weld progressively as I bend the tear back in place.
71D7CEB7-BC71-472B-BF72-704DBCF86039.jpeg
 
Top