Who best represents the core values of the Democrat party?

Who best represents the core values of the Democrat party?

  • AOC

    Votes: 1 8.3%
  • Kamala Harris

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Bernie Sanders

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Hakeem Jeffries

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Barack Obama

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Jasmine Crockett

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Gavin Newsom

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Nancy Pelosi

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 2 16.7%
  • I have no idea

    Votes: 9 75.0%

  • Total voters
    12
  • This poll will close: .

Slant Eyed Polack

Well-known member
CNN published a poll over the weekend. Except for "other" and "I have no idea" (my vote in this poll), these are the results - from top to bottom - of a survey of "Democratic or Democrat leaning independents." The remainder of CNN's top 10 are Tim Walz & Andy Beshear; FF only permits 10 choices.

If this is accurate (especially AOC/Kamala's status as top dogs), and it's how the rank & file intend to vote from here on out, I can only say "Bravo!" It'll guarantee Democrat irrelevance for a generation.

So let it be written, so let it be done.
 
The core values of the 1960’s Democratic Party are very different than the 1980’s version and those are very different than the 2010 version and again very different than today’s core values. Today the Democratic Party is very close to Stalin’s communist party in too many scary ways.
 
The Democrat party is doomed to oblivion as long as they continue to allow themselves to be dragged into the mud by their leftist, "progressive" wing. Their only hope is to move back to the center, and that means cutting ties with the far left, who can form their own, minority third party if they want. Of course, that would split the left generally, and that's why they don't want to do it. So, in short, they're screwed. Good.
 
Very hard to tell who represents the "CORE VALUES" of the Democratic party as it is impossible to discern what those values currently are.
For the longest time now, the Dems have stood for nothing but the perpetuation of their own power, and they'd provide lip service to whatever seemed most likely to gain them support at the time. The end result was the ballooning of the welfare state and the validation of a plethora of deviant special interests, until they became so amorphous and groundless that they can't even agree on what they stand for anymore. Women's rights or transgender rights? War or peace? Security or "reimagining" law enforcement? The list goes on. They are a the embodiment of a litany of self-contradictions.
 
Very hard to tell who represents the "CORE VALUES" of the Democratic party as it is impossible to discern what those values currently are.
Kind of a trick question, they have no values.
All you have to do is look past the trees and into the forest. Their values couldn't be more stark and obvious: power and control. In which case, everyone on that list is a contender.
 
All you have to do is look past the trees and into the forest. Their values couldn't be more stark and obvious: power and control. In which case, everyone on that list is a contender.


Exactly why I said eerily similar to Joseph Stalins form of dictatorial communism.

Raw and unbridled power. One party control. One idea. Tow the line.

Teams Obama and Biden tried to install: JUST TO NAME A COUPLE
  • Survelience everywhere, on everything we did (from traffic cameras to 'See Something Say Something')
  • Curtail and silence dissenting speech (Facebook, Twitter, etc)
  • Regulatory Burdens to make consumer choices "conform" to government (light bulbs, toilets, EVs, travel, etc)
  • Building codes to force people into apartments and usher in "15 minute cities"
  • Propaganda, propaganda & more propaganda from take over of schools K-College to take over of media
  • Men can be women, gender is fluid, women can be men . . .
  • Truth is relative, there is no 'good or evil'
  • Science is settled
  • . . .
 
This guy represents the MODERN Democratic party.

He literally reaches in between his asscrack and wipes poop on a Tesla.

Scroll back 2 years in time and this guy was probably heralding Tesla (and Elon Musk) as the saviors of the world from carbon criminals. Now he literally scratches for his own poo. There is clearly a mental illness involved in the disconnect.


 
This guy represents the MODERN Democratic party.

He literally reaches in between his asscrack and wipes poop on a Tesla.

Scroll back 2 years in time and this guy was probably heralding Tesla (and Elon Musk) as the saviors of the world from carbon criminals. Now he literally scratches for his own poo. There is clearly a mental illness involved in the disconnect.



She-he-it is also grossly overweight and Butt Ugly.

BTW, somebody should let these idiot creeps know that many Tesla's have security camera's recording who and what approaches them.
 
Douglas Murray is a famous WAR CORRESPONDENT based in England. He has turned his attention to US politics and may have the answer to the current issues facing the Democratic party.



AOC, Walz, Wuthese nuts are the future of the Democrats?!

By Douglas Murray
Published March 20, 2025, 6:26 p.m. ET
This was the week I became convinced that Don Lemon is an undercover MAGA operative. The former CNN presenter was on Bill Maher’s podcast the other day and was asked about the dire outlook for the Democratic Party. Which way should it go?
“People love AOC,” Lemon ventured. “People love Jasmine Crockett. People love Eric Swalwell and the like. I think the Democratic Party should put people out there who the people want — who they’re asking for.”
Maher begged to differ. People do not want these people, he pointed out. But Lemon continued to insist otherwise.
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has been floated by former CNN host Don Lemon as a potential future leader of the Democratic party.
3
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has been floated by former CNN host Don Lemon as a potential future leader of the Democratic Party. Getty Images
Personally, I suspect the only person who ever even pretended to love Eric Swalwell was Chinese spy Fang Fang, whom Rep. Swalwell was banging the other year. But that’s a detail.
As I say, the only explanation for Lemon’s statement (other than it being a characteristic brain-fart) is that Lemon is secretly working to keep the MAGA movement in power for the foreseeable future.
Because it is only if the Democrats swing to the hard left that they can make sure the Republicans continue in power unchallenged.
Desperate times may call for desperate thinking. And these are certainly desperate times for the Democrats.
Just consider how bad the situation is for the party.
First, it is utterly leaderless. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer is trying to hold the party together, but his decision to allow a vote on the Republicans’ government funding bill has led to fallout among the party’s gerontocracy.
Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, 84, this week jabbed at Schumer for giving something to the Republicans “for nothing” in exchange.
So dire has been the backlash against Schumer (a mere stripling at 74) that he has canceled his upcoming book tour. “Security concerns” have been offered as the reason.
That isn’t security concerns from Republican rivals — but rather from disgruntled members of his own party.
Second, there is the dire bench that the Democrats have coming up. One-time golden boy Gavin Newsom has spent recent weeks trying to tidy up his image faster than he tried to tidy up the Palisades.
Today Governor Gavin is trying to “reach out” and show himself to be a man of the political center. By interviewing Steve Bannon.
Yet the disasters of Newsom’s time as governor will continue to swirl around him. And it’s unlikely that smoke will be able to clear from a bit of light podcasting.
Then there is the left of the party that is trying to drag it their way. But just look at how pathetic it is. It sounds more like a street movement than a political movement.
At a recent protest against federal government expenditure cuts, Democratic Congressman Emanuel Cleaver told an audience: “I want to send a message to somebody. Elon, take your musty millions and musty Moscow rights to the moon. Because if you don’t, we are going to stand up, we are going to speak out, we´re going to march and we are going to do anything we need to do. You must your musty hands off our money or go to Moscow, you musty moo, moo, moo.”
The Gettysburg Address it was not.
But in case anyone forgets, Rep. Cleaver is a member of the Financial Services Subcommittee. And this is the best that he and his colleagues can do? To threaten to stand up and speak out and march and moo?
Similar vibes are coming out of Boston, where Mayor Michelle Wu yesterday announced again that her city will not comply with ICE or any other agencies seeking to remove dangerous illegal migrants from her area.
Boston Mayor Michelle Wu
3
Boston Mayor Michelle Wu said she would not comply with ICE agents working to remove illegal immigrants from her city. REUTERS
Confirming her stance, Wu said, “We stand with immigrants, you belong here. Boston doesn’t back down. If you come for one of us, you will get all of us.”
So Wu is willing to stand off against the federal government and law enforcement based on the idea that someone who breaks into America illegally and stays in Boston has as much right to be there as anyone who has spent their whole life working in the city and paying taxes there?
That’s a heck of a platform to run on.
Meanwhile, the party’s roadkill are doing what they can to cheer themselves up. This week, former VP candidate Tim Walz (remember him?) cropped up to boast about how masculine he is and how threatening that makes him to Republicans. I won’t repeat the nickname that did for Tim.
Minnesota Governor Tim Walz holding a microphone during a town hall in Eau Claire, Wisconsin
3
Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz said Republicans were scared of his masculinity. Holden Smith/ZUMA Press / SplashNews.com
But he also tried to rally the troops by flirting with the movement that currently thinks the best form of political protest is to set fire to Teslas or key them when you see them in a parking lot.
Walz didn’t tell people to do that, but he did tell an audience this week that he recently added Tesla to the stock app on his iPhone. He had done so, he said, in order to give himself “a little boost during the day.”
In the ranting style that so endeared him to the electorate last year, he started screaming “225 and dropping” as the crowd whooped.
You might ask how shares in Gov. Walz’s own political future are doing these days. You might also ask whether Walz is aware how much pension stock in Minnesota is backed up by Tesla stock.
It´s not a much prettier picture in this town, where the best challenger the Democrats can run for mayor is Andrew Cuomo — a former governor who was forced to resign in shame.
If the Democrats are willing to take any friendly advice, they should accept the fact that they really need to come up with some coherent policies. Something at a higher level than a street protest.
But if you were their enemy? Well then, like Don Lemon, you’d tell them to go the way of AOC and Cleaver and Walz and Wu, and encourage them to moo and moo ’til they can moo no more.
 
"Because it is only if the Democrats swing to the hard left that they can make sure the Republicans continue in power unchallenged."

Truer words were never spoken. And in the words of Tim Walz, I get "a little boost during the day" whenever I hear these radical leftists ranting and raving and promising to be the future of the Dem party. The AOC fringe left might have 20% support in the country, and that's being generous. They are never going to win at the national level, nor should they. Americans are too smart and level headed to fall for their hateful rhetoric or to adopt their stance that violence against the opposition is perfectly acceptable.

So, let them go nuts. And let the Dem party's internal civil war continue. I find it entertaining, but more importantly, it keeps the pendulum swinging our way just that much longer.
 
The Democratic Party has a broad range of values and priorities, so the answer depends on which aspects you consider most important. Obama and Pelosi represent the party’s establishment and legislative experience, while AOC and Bernie Sanders push progressive policies. Hakeem Jeffries, as House Minority Leader, embodies leadership and party unity. Newsom and Harris bring executive experience. It really comes down to what issues and leadership style resonate most with you.
Can you elaborate on their "values and priorities"? Sure, there's lots of experience and leadership but I'm not understanding how their values and priorities align with the majority of the population.
 
Can you elaborate on their "values and priorities"? Sure, there's lots of experience and leadership but I'm not understanding how their values and priorities align with the majority of the population.
His IP is from Pakistan but he claims he's from Canada.
His posts sure sound like they are written by A/I.
 
The Democratic Party has a broad range of values and priorities …
Clearly written by a chat bot/AI assistant but it is wrong.

I disagree with the post’s premise and points

They are a rudderless ship

The only thing the agree upon is opposition to everything that the Trump administration supports.

They would not clap for a 12 year old cancer survivor who had 5 surgeries

They do not support deporting VIOLENT criminal ILLEGAL aliens who were arrested

They do not support eliminating government waste

They do, seemingly support an endless war in Ukraine but oppose winnable peace in Gaza

Hypocrites and leaderless they have no solutions
 
Top