jpr62902
Jeanclaude Spam Banhammer
Hard to argue that..
As of now I am no longer shorting the S&P. Your right it does have a high cost. But as Fred points out it is also a form of insurance, in case the house really does burn down..
But say $10,000 of SKF in 2008 A.D. before that big correction, protecting say $250,000 in pre crash value, would have paid off handsomely. For those of us who think that the market is in fact a Casino, with no real correlation to the economy it is just another bet on the table, to be put on and taken off as your "gut" tells you when the market is at all time highs. It never stays there long.....
You don't have to keep it around for long. Just for those times when you are getting real nervous about the market, short term. I should have bought some the week before the down term, or sold out my positions, as my guts were telling me loudly to do.. But on vacation it is hard to do so realistically, and not ruin a good time with family. I am young enough, with lots of other assets to help me in retirement, and with S.S. the retirement fund is more for "wants" than "needs" for me..
And I have the time for the market to turn around to..
Regards, Kirk
I subscribe more to time in the market, versus timing the market. Still, SKF did have its time. Here's its chart since 2007: