WTF
Is she imply she does not think they are smart enough so they need more help and need it sooner?
Such a racist. OMG.
-
Please be sure to read the rules and adhere to them. Some banned members have complained that they are not spammers. But they spammed us. Some even tried to redirect our members to other forums. Duh. Be smart. Read the rules and adhere to them and we will all get along just fine. Cheers. :beer: Link to the rules: https://www.forumsforums.com/threads/forum-rules-info.2974/
The Kamala Harris / Tim Walz "Positions" Thread - post actual political points here
- Thread starter Melensdad
- Start date
WTF
Is she imply she does not think they are smart enough so they need more help and need it sooner?
Such a racist. OMG.
Patriot
Well-known member
She's talking about that whole "equity" nonsense again, and I can't help but say a few lines about this, because it follows a misguided philosophy on the left that stands at the heart of the decline of America. Whereas equality means equal opportunity, equity means equal outcomes. We are all for everyone having a fair chance to succeed, but that does not mean the government should step in to give certain people stuff based on where they came from, or their skin color, just to make up for them not succeeding.
She tries to justify this equity idea by saying we don't all start in the same place, so some people need extra help. While it's true we don't all start in the same place, i.e., some people have richer parents than others, and some are born American while others are born Nigerian, etc.; that has ALWAYS been true, and will always be true. Some of us might have to work harder to get there, but as long as their is equal opportunity, it's possible for anyone to get there, at least here in America.
However, once you start rewarding people for NOT getting there, using the excuse that they didn't start at the same place, then you remove the incentive to TRY, and that is the beginning of the end of ambition, work ethic, and, ultimately, the American spirit.
Last edited:
Patriot
Well-known member
Notice that the precise question to her is: Should folks stand for the National Anthem? He didn't ask if folks must stand for the National Anthem. Just, should they. Seems like a no-brainer. Yet she goes out of her way to avoid answering in the affirmative, and instead goes on this long rant about how we have freedoms, as if the guy was implying that we don't when it comes to standing for the anthem.
Imagine if he had asked her something like this: Should folks support the transgender community? Not only would she have answered with a clear YES, but she probably would have added that WE MUST support the transgender community, as if it should be a mandated law.
So, this tells you a lot about a person who is unwilling to simply encourage the practice of standing for the National Anthem, yet would dictate to us lefty woke beliefs, totally ignoring the fact that even these crazy beliefs are allowed to be had and discussed because of the freedom that this country, symbolized by its flag and its anthem, allows.
Voting for Kamala Harris to take over after the Biden administration is just like changing your shirt after you shit your pants.
47 people showed up?
And she is supposed to be ahead in Michigan according to many of the pollsters?
WTF?
47 people showed up?
And she is supposed to be ahead in Michigan according to many of the pollsters?
WTF?
Last edited:
Patriot
Well-known member
The polls always favor the Dem. I've done a study comparing polls from four years ago to election results four years ago in each of the swing states. I won't bore you with all the numbers, but suffice it to say that, on average, polls favored the Dem by 4-5 percent compared to actual results. Based on that, if the election were held today, Trump wins ALL the swing states. Not an exact science for sure, but I'd bet on it.
That said, we all need to vote. Don't take anything for granted. If there are any "shenanigans" this election cycle, we need to win by so much that they can't overcome the lead, i.e., Too Big To Rig!
FrancSevin
Proudly Deplorable
Really Kamala? Please, read the book before you give us a report on its contents.
Patriot
Well-known member
The utter, circular emptiness of Harris' answer is even more stark when you see it written:
Question: But it seems that Prime Minister Netanyahu is not listening...
Harris: Well, Bill, the work that we have done has resulted in a number of movements in that region by Israel that were very much prompted by or a result of many things including our advocacy for what needs to happen in the region.
This is the end result of the left's obsession with identity politics: Kamala Harris, probably the single dumbest person ever to run for U.S. president, is actually seriously considered by roughly half of Americans to receive their votes. Simply mind-boggling in its ridiculousness. They may as well be supporting a head of lettuce for president. As long as it's not Trump, right?
Lets not forget, this is a book that that was published without anything in it.
Kamala says she owns a Glock...
Note that California law classifies ALL Glocks as "unsafe handguns" because they do not have a compliant chamber load indicator, lack a magazine disconnect mechanism, and until our lawsuit caused California to repeal the requirement, of course lacked microstamping.
The only reason she can still buy Gen 3s is because they are grandfathered in, but they are still "unsafe handguns". So did she buy one of the Gen 3 guns?
They can't sell more modern Glocks new in gun stores (just secondhand from exempt cops, or from those who moved here with them from other states). She supported the Unsafe Handgun Act and expanded it such that microstamping began to be enforced in 2013.
So why does she own an "unsafe handgun"?
Note that California law classifies ALL Glocks as "unsafe handguns" because they do not have a compliant chamber load indicator, lack a magazine disconnect mechanism, and until our lawsuit caused California to repeal the requirement, of course lacked microstamping.
The only reason she can still buy Gen 3s is because they are grandfathered in, but they are still "unsafe handguns". So did she buy one of the Gen 3 guns?
They can't sell more modern Glocks new in gun stores (just secondhand from exempt cops, or from those who moved here with them from other states). She supported the Unsafe Handgun Act and expanded it such that microstamping began to be enforced in 2013.
So why does she own an "unsafe handgun"?
Patriot
Well-known member
Nope. I want to see the "glock." I bet she doesn't really even know what that is. He should have asked her which caliber glock. That would have stumped her. Still thinking it's a BB gun.
Patriot
Well-known member
She simply won't admit explicitly that the Biden/Harris lack of border enforcement has allowed in too many illegals, but her avoidance of the question is the admission.
So one has to wonder if Biden is trying to "help" Harris win.
It was widely anticipated that many women would watch THE VIEW because Harris was a scheduled guest.
What did Biden do to help Harris?
He scheduled a PRESS CONFERENCES for the same time as Harris would be on The View.
Is that because he wanted to make sure her word salad was not seen? Or was he doing it to steal the spotlight?
It was widely anticipated that many women would watch THE VIEW because Harris was a scheduled guest.
What did Biden do to help Harris?
He scheduled a PRESS CONFERENCES for the same time as Harris would be on The View.
Is that because he wanted to make sure her word salad was not seen? Or was he doing it to steal the spotlight?
Patriot
Well-known member
The CBS website still has the "actual" version up. You can see it here: https://www.cbs.com/shows/video/thwxsEjsdNz_Yj_ZCO_cFpmt7xhOiz29/
Not sure where the "edited" version came from.
Patriot
Well-known member
I wonder if she considers the flood of illegals entering the country tied to one of the decisions with "impact?"
Patriot
Well-known member
Okay, now I just saw the interview that was televised, and NOW I see what you were talking about. They actually edited the interview to air an answer to the question that she DID NOT give in the original. I would not have believed it if I didn't see it. Totally insane.
Yup, 2 versions.
CBS is taking so much heat over this that FOX News is covering the story about how CBS is selectively-deceptively editing her interview.
Patriot
Well-known member
You would think that they would at least try to cover their tracks by having the interview that is on their website match the one that they televised, but nope. It is so blatantly obvious that they edited it to make Harris look better. Mind boggling, really.
Patriot
Well-known member
So, to sum up Harris' answer: Things would be different from a Biden to a Harris presidency because she is not Biden, and she wants an opportunity economy, and she really believes in the aspirations and dreams of the American people.
How Profound!
I mean, finally, somebody who wants the economy to include opportunity, and somebody who finally understands that we Americans have aspirations and dreams. And, most importantly, she is somebody who realizes that she and Joe Biden are different people. Different! Not the same person! Wow. This is earth-shattering stuff people!
