Data shows AOC/Sanders Campaign Tour is being Faked + Democrat Base is switching Parties

[Melensdad]

As if the Trump Derangement couldn't get any worse, there are 2 stories, unrelated, but when combined tell one hell of a story.

FIRST, far left firebrand A.O.C. and grumpy socialist Bernie Sanders are on what can best be described a 'comedy' tour playing their extreme leftist agenda to the unhinged professional pollsters. Read that again. Because cell phone data shows the people are probably being bused into their tour locations, and the people showing up have long histories of being bused to these events. Like Taylor Swift fans, many of these attendees have been to nearly 10 socialist events, many have also attended BLM protests, Anti-Semetic/Anti-Israel protests, etc. Cellphone tracking data tells the story!

'Inorganic' - GPS Data Reveals Bernie Sanders, AOC Anti-Oligarchy Rally Was Full Of Serial Protesters | ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

'Inorganic' - GPS Data Reveals Bernie Sanders, AOC Anti-Oligarchy Rally Was Full Of Serial Protesters​

The Democratic Party launched a full-scale propaganda blitz in a desperate attempt to sway public opinion as its favorability ratings plunged to record lows. True to form, the party of leftist radicals prefers to bend reality—relying on rent-a-protesters or, in this case, inorganic crowds—to create a false perception of popularity. And that's exactly what unfolded on Friday in Denver. ​

​

Drone footage shows a large crowd as U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vermont, spoke at Denver's Civic Center. The outspoken socialist wrote on X: "34,000 people out in Denver. Largest political rally there since 2008." ​

​

Sanders attempted to explain that the large turnout reflected what voters are saying:"No to authoritarianism. No to oligarchy. No to Trumpism."​

​

​

​

However, leftist corporate media failed to fact-check the socialist for misinformation or disinformation. Others did—using a sophisticated algorithm to analyze data from all smartphone devices at the event—and found the numbers were severely overinflated. ​

​

Many of the attendees were probably bussed in and had a history of participating in Antifa/BLM, pro-Hamas, and pro-Palestinian protests. The Democratic Party is known for bussing activists through NGO networks to events to fill seats—a tactic repeatedly used throughout Kamala Harris' 2024 presidential campaign trail to create fake hype. ​

​

Data analyst Tony Seruga exposed just how staged the latest Democratic Party rally was, revealing their ongoing attempts to manipulate public perception with inorganic crowds made up mainly of DEI activists rather than genuine grassroots supporters:​

​

​

​

Once again, this is based a very sophisticated algorithm that looks at the behavioral metrics for each device, including the physical 1:1 proximity to leaders and paymasters from these groups in the past.​

GPS—Here we go again, there were 20,189 devices. Still a large crowd but not even close to the 30,000 quoted in Denver newspapers nor the 34,000 quoted by Bernie Sanders and AOC.

84% of the devices present had attended 9 or more Kamala Harris rallies, antifa/blm, pro-Hamas, pro-Palestinian protests, 31% had attended over 20.

For more insight into what data we also look at in addition to GPS location data would be demographic and psychographic data using over 6,000 different databases, i.e., like the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), Pew Research Center, market research firms like YouGov, Experian, specialized tools like ESRI's Tapestry Segmentation, consumer surveys, social media platforms like 𝕏, Facebook, Linkedin.

Demographic data includes basic characteristics like age, gender, income, education level, occupation, marital status, family size, ethnicity, and where people live (e.g., city, state).

Psychographic data dives deeper into people's lifestyles, values, attitudes, interests, personality traits, social class, activities, and how they make purchasing decisions. For example, it might show if someone values sustainability, enjoys outdoor activities, participates in community activism.

While demographic data is straightforward, psychographic data can reveal sensitive personal details, like beliefs even life goals.

Additionally, by cross pollinating each device with other devices regularly within close proximity to the target device we are able to build a detailed profile for each target.

90% of those in the above 84% were likely working with one of these five groups and is the reason for their presence.

Once again, this is based a very sophisticated algorithm that looks at the behavioral metrics for each device, including the physical 1:1 proximity to leaders and paymasters from these groups in the past.

Disruption Project, Rise & Resist, Indivisible Project, Troublemakers and the Democratic Socialists of America.

Each receives money from ActBlue and at least three, via USAID.

Disruption Project, Rise & Resist, Indivisible Project, Troublemakers and the Democratic Socialists of America.​

​

Each receives money from ActBlue and at least three, via USAID. ​

Disruption Project: Legal status is unclear, likely operating illegally. Rise & Resist: 501c4 non-profit Indivisible Project: 501c4 non-profit Troublemakers: Legal status is for profit. Democratic Socialists of America: 501c4 non-profit​

NOW, combine that story, very clearly showing how radical these activist protestors are, by attending, on average a dozen events, with this story about the general wilting of support by "normal people" who are fleeing the Democratic Party and we can see that the only people left in the Democratic party are the whining, deranged "Karens" of the world, their transgender 4 year olds in need of mental therapy, and the Antifa/BLM/Pro-Hamas terrorist wing of the party.

The Daily Caller News Foundation takes a great look at the party, this is NOT your father's Democratic Party. This is NOT JFK's Democratic Party. Hell this isn't even Bill Clinton's Democratic Party.

‘Never Seen Anything Like This’: Crucial Voter Groups Fleeing Democrats, Says Stunned Fmr Clinton Pollster

Mark Penn admitted Friday on Fox News that crucial voter groups are fleeing the Democratic party.

dailycaller.com

‘Never Seen Anything Like This’: Crucial Voter Groups Fleeing Democrats, Says Stunned Fmr Clinton Pollster​

Mariane AngelaMarch 21, 2025 10:31 PM ET​

​

Former Clinton pollster Mark Penn said Friday on Fox News that crucial voter groups are fleeing the Democratic Party.​

​

The Democratic Party’s favorability rating plummeted to a new low of 29%, according to a CNN/SSRS poll conducted from March 6-9. During an appearance on “Hannity,” Penn said he was shocked at the current state of the Democratic Party and said he’s never seen its rating this low in decades.​

​

“I’ve never seen anything like this in over 40 years of polling. The Democratic Party ratings have collapsed from a 47% favorable down to 29, 27 in some of these polls, and that’s an incredible loss of moderate, working-class voters,” Penn said.​

​

WATCH:​

​

​

Penn said that the party seems to be shrinking to a base composed primarily of left-wing advocates like Independent Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders and Democratic New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who have been actively promoting the Democratic platform across the country. (RELATED: ‘Finish This Party Off’: Former Clinton Pollster Warns AOC Challenging Chuck Schumer Could Be Final Blow For Democrats)​

​

“Those [are the] kinds of voters that the Democratic Party needs to win elections, and it’s being shrunk to a base of left-wing advocates like Bernie Sanders and AOC who were touring the country carrying the Democratic banner. That’s not helping,” Penn added.​

​

A group of national Democratic organizations, including the Democratic National Committee, Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, and the Association of State Democratic Committees, initiated the “People’s Town Halls” tour last Friday in Iowa, targeting Republican-controlled districts throughout the U.S. This campaign follows the Democratic Party’s substantial losses in the 2024 elections, where Republicans captured the White House and majorities in both chambers of Congress.​

​

Democrats have formed a resistance to oppose President Donald Trump’s policies, specifically targeting the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), headed by Elon Musk, which has reduced federal agency workforces. The creation of DOGE, which aims to cut government expenditures, has ignited fierce Democratic Party resistance, but it has also garnered significant support from the American populace.​

​

In the House, Ocasio-Cortez has attacked the Trump-endorsed government spending bill, calling it a “slush fund” for Trump and Musk on social media. Meanwhile, Democratic Pennsylvania Sen. John Fetterman slammed his party’s resistance to the bill, dismissing it as “total theater.”​

​

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.​

​

 

[300 H and H]

Democrats seem to be doing a rather good job of self-destruction. This is the power of the truth. It's just as it should be...

 

[Patriot]

The fact that what is remaining of the Dem party has to resort to smoke and mirrors in order to create the illusion of popular support is the best indicator that they are in big trouble. I really hope that the likes of AOC and Bernie Sanders continue to carry the feeble torch for that party, and become the normal face of it. That way, conservatives have nothing to worry about come midterm elections.

 

[Melensdad]

Democrats seem to be doing a rather good job of self-destruction. This is the power of the truth. It's just as it should be...

Well even far left leaning (pretending to be centrist) AXIOS has jumped on the story of the self immolation of the Democratic party.

https://www.axios.com/2025/03/24/democrats-popularity-crisis-trump-elections

Behind the Curtain: Dems' dark, deep hole​

​

Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios​

​

​

Top Democrats tell us their party is in its deepest hole in nearly 50 years — and they fear things could actually get worse: ​

​

• The party has its lowest favorability ever.
• No popular national leader to help improve it.
• Insufficient numbers to stop most legislation in Congress.

• A durable minority on the Supreme Court.
• Dwindling influence over the media ecosystem, with right-leaning podcasters and social media accounts ascendant.
• Young voters are growing dramatically more conservative.
• A bad 2026 map for Senate races.
• Democratic Senate retirements could make it harder for the party to flip the House, with members tempted by statewide races.
• There are only three House Republicans in districts former Vice President Harris won in 2024, a dim sign for a Democratic surge. There were 23 eight years ago in seats Hillary Clinton won.
• And, thanks to the number of people fleeing blue states, the math for a Dem to win the presidency will just get harder in 2030.

Why it matters: Both parties — after losing the White House, Senate and House — suffer and search for salvation. But rarely does healing seem so hard and redemption so distant.​

​

• Doug Sosnik — a senior adviser to President Bill Clinton, and widely followed thinker on political megatrends — told us this is Dems' deepest hole in at least the 45 years since Ronald Reagan's victory in 1980. Sosnik said the 2024 election was at least as much a repudiation of Democrats as it was a victory for Trump.

As Ezra Klein noted this month in his New York Times column, if current population patterns hold, Democrats will suffer a devastating blow after the 2030 census: The party will lose as many as a dozen House seats and electoral votes.​

​

• He points out that in that Electoral College, Dems could win all the states Harris carried in 2024 — plus Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin — and still lose the White House.

The big picture: Democrats' dismal reality is not Republican spin. In fact, there's broad consensus among Democratic leaders that most current political, cultural, media and generational trends are cutting against them.​

​

• "Democrats are losing working-class voters," Klein, co-author with Derek Thompson of the new liberal blueprint "Abundance," said last week. "They're seeing their margins among nonwhite voters erode and vanish. They're losing young voters. Something is wrong in the Democratic Party."

By the numbers: A deep, comprehensive poll by Democratic pollster David Shor of Blue Rose Research captured vividly and empirically the daunting data.​

​

• For those skeptical of polls and sampling size, Shor's study is based on 26 milliononline responses collected over the course of 2024, and filtered to adjust to oddities of modern polling.
• Shor said on Klein's podcast, "The Ezra Klein Show," that his most striking finding — and the one most worrisome to him — is the surging pro-Trump/MAGA/Republican views and voting patterns of young men, immigrants and anyone other than strident liberals.

Shor estimates a 23-point swing against Democrats among immigrants. The swing is very pronounced among Hispanics who consider themselves conservatives: Democratic support dropped by 50%.​

​

• But it's the rise of conservatism among young people, mainly men, that spooks him most. "[Y]oung voters — regardless of race and gender — have become more Republican," Shor writes in his 33-slide presentation. (Request the deck.)
• Ali Mortell, director of research at Blue Rose Research, told Axios' Tal Axelrod: "Millennials were one of the most progressive generations, and it's looking like Gen Z is about to be one of the most conservative."

The thing he's been most shocked by over the last four years, Shor told Klein: "[Y]oung people have gone from being the most progressive generation since the Baby Boomers, and maybe even in some ways more so, to becoming potentially the most conservative generation that we've experienced maybe in 50 to 60 years."​

​

​

• A gender gap has exploded: 18-year-old men were 23 points more likely to support Donald Trump than 18-year-old women, which Shor called "just completely unprecedented in American politics."
• Sosnik told us that young men who didn't go to college "are firmly for Trump, not just against Democrats." He said young white women who didn't attend college "may be as much anti-Democrat as pro-Trump. And then the outliers are college women, who are very pro-Democratic. But it'll be very hard to dislodge the Republicans' success with non-college white men under 30."

STORY CONTINUES AT THE AXIOS LINK ABOVE