Snowy Rivers
Well-known member
Copy on the valve length, push rods, springs and such.
The Vortec heads were purpose designed to do what they do and do it well....Cam lift, duration and such is very mild and things really work fine given the emissions parameters for the rigs they ran in....1996 to 2000 GM Pickup L31 5.7 engines.
Then along comes some clown that wants to change the rules for Off highway use ....Then things go out the window.
Most hot rod folks want high RPM and big power with the Vortec heads....
In my case I want modest power at up to 4500 or so RPM
The stock Rocker arms are a 1.5:1 ratio......The other option is a 1.6:1 which is going the wrong way......
The heads have a fairly tall valve guide boss and the distance between the seal and the spring retainer is pretty limited...
Some sources say max lift at .420"....Others say .480" and so it goes on the internet sources....The only way to get good data is to measure things up and see....
The major performance outfits all offer Tools to cut the guide boss, open up the spring seat area, different springs, different retainers, and on it goes.
All good stuff for the performance seeker that wants to twist his little mouse motor high wide and handsome......
I don't need stiff valve springs that can handle 7000 RPM without floating......Stock spring rates will be fine for the application.....
Getting a bit more clearance between the retainers and the seals will get us in the ball park.....The machinist and I spoke of using a bit different set of springs he had that would work better and have a bit more room with zero worry about coil bind.
I do not want to spend $$$$$$ on screw in Rocker studs and such.....Simply do not need them for the spring pressure we are running and the low RPM
The Vortec 5.7 used hydraulic roller cam/lifters ....The push rods are shorter because of the longer lifters....
A set of standard production length push rods for the 400 SBC will get things where we need to be.....Going to use the stock valve guided rocker arms (These have a slot in the tip that sits over the end of the valve to keep the rocker centered)
Until I opened up that 5.7 Vortec I had never seen any of these rockers.....Guess I missed out on that staff meeting.
IF...I had decided to go with a "Grocery getter" cam with lifts in the .400" range .....we would not be having this discussion, and I would have used the heads as is other than drilling the steam holes...
BUT OHHHH NOOOOO....I gotta have a bit of a Rumpy cam in my 406 inch Thunder Mouse........
So such is life........Plus I wanted to use the Late style serpentine belt drive system that came with the Vortec engine....
The serp drive needs heads with 3 bolt holes on the front of the RH head
The late serp drive system has the AC compressor on top on the drivers side.....This bad boy gets modified to handle the compressed air needs for the steering......Alternators available are stout and high amp units are pretty much stock....
Using the reverse rotation water pump style from the 1990 S10 (Same pump as used on the V8 of same year) this gives us a true GEN 1 cooling system flow through the bypass port......Which needs to be drilled in the RH head (Vortecs do not have this hole)
The 400 sbc has all the older GEN 1 cooling system passages......I just did not want to have to fool around with the mickey mouse fixes to keep from having weird heat spikes and air locks due to the Vortec head changes in coolant flow.
With the bypass hole drilled in the deck of the RH head and using the early serp drive water pump ...All these issues do not exist........
NOW
Truth be known.....I could have avoided all these issues and just installed a complete mid 90's TBI 350 with a carb type intake (These have heat passage) ...BUT OHHHH NO ....I gots to have the big inch small block.....Big bore, long stroke and all the goody yums......
Haaaaaaaaaaa.....JUST BECAUSE.....So along with "The I want" comes a host of things to deal with........
Back to Cat Central and the rear cabin mounting.
Slowly getting the LH mounting Bridge fabricated and in place.
I discovered yesterday late in the day that both the 2100 chassis and the S10 BODY can't be trusted to be exactly straight and the same from side to side......
Getting the Bridge assembly lined up and ready to start welding stuff in place and I find an error of about 1/2" ARRRRRRRGH.
Turned out that part of it was due to what looks like a sloppy repair to the rear of the cat chassis.......I just could not figure it out....Then I walked back about 20 feet and looked down the top rail of the tub on the cat and spotted the issue.....
The last 6" of the tub rail tweaked inward and this accounted for the error in my dims on the new parts.....
The reference points I used on the S10 body are likely not good either due to production tolerances in the sheet metal....
So I went back and referenced off the lower heavier part of the cat tub where the rear diffy mounts and found these to be pretty good....Then lined up the bridge tube with the lower part of the tub.....
Now the reference points are down in the 1/8" range as far as difference go......I can live with this......
The one point on the sheet metal that seems off may be just normal production.....Or it may be from getting tweaked over the years from some damage or ???? Who knows......Anyway....The body mount is moving ahead and looks fine.....
Just a matter of "Fudging" a bit here and there to even out and lessen the error........
I really do not think that Thiokol was all that fussy about stuff.....GITTERDONE and out the door.....Then add 50 years of GAWD knows what has happened to it.....
All this stuff is aesthetics anyway and is just to make sure the cab sections are in line and will look decent when finished....
This stuff has no effect on the drive train or operation of the cat.....
Got the beam front pedestal bolts in and the rear mount to the body is located and getting some weld on it......
I need to RE-Shuffle the blocks to allow getting the rear upright tube in and welded to the lower chassis.......
Trying hard to get all the points where the body sits on the new mountings contacting evenly.......The original mounting on the S10 had some shims between the mount points and the mounting biscuit hardware.....I can avoid this stuff simply by fabricating things in place and measuring as we go.... the factory error was 1/16" to 1/8" shims.......
I see no point in putting tweaks in things from the gitgo.......
Back at it today........
The Vortec heads were purpose designed to do what they do and do it well....Cam lift, duration and such is very mild and things really work fine given the emissions parameters for the rigs they ran in....1996 to 2000 GM Pickup L31 5.7 engines.
Then along comes some clown that wants to change the rules for Off highway use ....Then things go out the window.
Most hot rod folks want high RPM and big power with the Vortec heads....
In my case I want modest power at up to 4500 or so RPM
The stock Rocker arms are a 1.5:1 ratio......The other option is a 1.6:1 which is going the wrong way......
The heads have a fairly tall valve guide boss and the distance between the seal and the spring retainer is pretty limited...
Some sources say max lift at .420"....Others say .480" and so it goes on the internet sources....The only way to get good data is to measure things up and see....
The major performance outfits all offer Tools to cut the guide boss, open up the spring seat area, different springs, different retainers, and on it goes.
All good stuff for the performance seeker that wants to twist his little mouse motor high wide and handsome......
I don't need stiff valve springs that can handle 7000 RPM without floating......Stock spring rates will be fine for the application.....
Getting a bit more clearance between the retainers and the seals will get us in the ball park.....The machinist and I spoke of using a bit different set of springs he had that would work better and have a bit more room with zero worry about coil bind.
I do not want to spend $$$$$$ on screw in Rocker studs and such.....Simply do not need them for the spring pressure we are running and the low RPM
The Vortec 5.7 used hydraulic roller cam/lifters ....The push rods are shorter because of the longer lifters....
A set of standard production length push rods for the 400 SBC will get things where we need to be.....Going to use the stock valve guided rocker arms (These have a slot in the tip that sits over the end of the valve to keep the rocker centered)
Until I opened up that 5.7 Vortec I had never seen any of these rockers.....Guess I missed out on that staff meeting.
IF...I had decided to go with a "Grocery getter" cam with lifts in the .400" range .....we would not be having this discussion, and I would have used the heads as is other than drilling the steam holes...
BUT OHHHH NOOOOO....I gotta have a bit of a Rumpy cam in my 406 inch Thunder Mouse........
So such is life........Plus I wanted to use the Late style serpentine belt drive system that came with the Vortec engine....
The serp drive needs heads with 3 bolt holes on the front of the RH head
The late serp drive system has the AC compressor on top on the drivers side.....This bad boy gets modified to handle the compressed air needs for the steering......Alternators available are stout and high amp units are pretty much stock....
Using the reverse rotation water pump style from the 1990 S10 (Same pump as used on the V8 of same year) this gives us a true GEN 1 cooling system flow through the bypass port......Which needs to be drilled in the RH head (Vortecs do not have this hole)
The 400 sbc has all the older GEN 1 cooling system passages......I just did not want to have to fool around with the mickey mouse fixes to keep from having weird heat spikes and air locks due to the Vortec head changes in coolant flow.
With the bypass hole drilled in the deck of the RH head and using the early serp drive water pump ...All these issues do not exist........
NOW
Truth be known.....I could have avoided all these issues and just installed a complete mid 90's TBI 350 with a carb type intake (These have heat passage) ...BUT OHHHH NO ....I gots to have the big inch small block.....Big bore, long stroke and all the goody yums......
Haaaaaaaaaaa.....JUST BECAUSE.....So along with "The I want" comes a host of things to deal with........
Back to Cat Central and the rear cabin mounting.
Slowly getting the LH mounting Bridge fabricated and in place.
I discovered yesterday late in the day that both the 2100 chassis and the S10 BODY can't be trusted to be exactly straight and the same from side to side......
Getting the Bridge assembly lined up and ready to start welding stuff in place and I find an error of about 1/2" ARRRRRRRGH.
Turned out that part of it was due to what looks like a sloppy repair to the rear of the cat chassis.......I just could not figure it out....Then I walked back about 20 feet and looked down the top rail of the tub on the cat and spotted the issue.....
The last 6" of the tub rail tweaked inward and this accounted for the error in my dims on the new parts.....
The reference points I used on the S10 body are likely not good either due to production tolerances in the sheet metal....
So I went back and referenced off the lower heavier part of the cat tub where the rear diffy mounts and found these to be pretty good....Then lined up the bridge tube with the lower part of the tub.....
Now the reference points are down in the 1/8" range as far as difference go......I can live with this......
The one point on the sheet metal that seems off may be just normal production.....Or it may be from getting tweaked over the years from some damage or ???? Who knows......Anyway....The body mount is moving ahead and looks fine.....
Just a matter of "Fudging" a bit here and there to even out and lessen the error........
I really do not think that Thiokol was all that fussy about stuff.....GITTERDONE and out the door.....Then add 50 years of GAWD knows what has happened to it.....
All this stuff is aesthetics anyway and is just to make sure the cab sections are in line and will look decent when finished....
This stuff has no effect on the drive train or operation of the cat.....
Got the beam front pedestal bolts in and the rear mount to the body is located and getting some weld on it......
I need to RE-Shuffle the blocks to allow getting the rear upright tube in and welded to the lower chassis.......
Trying hard to get all the points where the body sits on the new mountings contacting evenly.......The original mounting on the S10 had some shims between the mount points and the mounting biscuit hardware.....I can avoid this stuff simply by fabricating things in place and measuring as we go.... the factory error was 1/16" to 1/8" shims.......
I see no point in putting tweaks in things from the gitgo.......
Back at it today........