Anyone Watching The State of the Union Tonight?

[Melensdad]

I didn't watch any of it. I can't think of anything that Joe Biden would or could say that I would be in the least bit interested in.

I did not end up seeing from beginning to end.

But I tried to catch what I could.

It was lie after promise after mischaracterization after lie after promise after . . .

But I will say for people ignorant of who government actually serves, and how it works, it actually sounded pretty good.

 

[Ross 650]

I did not watch any of it for the same reason I dont watch people in a toilet. I cant stand the smell!!!!

 

[tiredretired]

Really good drugs is my bet.

Absolutely, he is on that time release 12 hour Adderall for sure. After watching parts of that speech, I needed 500 mg of Fukitol. It works every time. Good stuff.

 

[Melensdad]

Here is a summary of the speech AFTER some polling data has been taken.

Interesting read from the Washington Examiner that seems to defy the pundit's views.

Biden’s speech was not the win the political class thought it was - Washington Examiner

Despite the media narrative, Pennsylvania voters were not persuaded to support President Joe Biden after the State of the Union address.

www.washingtonexaminer.com

Biden’s speech was not the win the political class thought it was​

Salena ZitoMarch 12, 2024 4:54 pm
DELAWARE COUNTY, Pennsylvania — It is a bit jarring to observe the divide between what the legacy press, Democrats, and cable news hosts observed when they watched President Joe Biden’s State of the Union address last Thursday, and how persuadable voters of both Republican and Democratic leanings reacted.

On the day after the speech, MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough said Biden gave “his best speech of his presidency by far. … Strongest speech, and, most importantly, for people that were thinking, ‘Oh, he’s too old. He’s too that, man’ … he gave a lot more than he got.”
. . .
However, in sitting with several voters whose presidential choices have been all over the place for the past 20 years, with some of them jumping from George W. Bush to Obama to Trump to Biden, the president’s comportment did not come off as strength.

Instead, many of them felt they were being yelled at.

Intellectually, they all understood why Biden needed to project vigor. They also all agreed that vigor and yelling are not the same thing.

These suburban Philadelphia voters say former President Donald Trump’s comportment is a bridge too far for them, but they also don’t care much for Biden either. Where their votes go, they have no idea, but if you are a Democratic strategist sitting at home and thought Biden’s performance shored up this voting bloc, you might want to go back to the drawing board.

NPR handled the coverage wisely. Reporter Tamara Keith spent some time with Karen Seagraves, 52, the kind of independent voter President Joe Biden’s campaign needs to attract in states such as Pennsylvania, Michigan, Georgia, Wisconsin, Arizona, and her home state of North Carolina.

Keith wrote an hour into Biden’s speech that Seagraves said she wasn’t feeling it.​

​

“I think this entire thing has been lackluster,” Seagraves told her, adding, “I can’t think of a better word. Just — vanilla,” she said.​

​

As Biden touched on a laundry list of political promises, Seagraves said she thought his details were slim and that she still had no sense of what his plans were for the country, and at the end of the speech remarked she was left feeling it was an hour of her life she was never going to get back.​

Five years ago, the Democrats took control of this suburban county for the first time since the Civil War when the five-member council went from an all-Republican panel to an all-Democratic panel.

Much of that flip was blamed on Trump, although Delaware County voters have voted Democratic for president since Al Gore, so the flip is more nuanced and had an equal amount to do with the flight of liberal voters to the Philadelphia suburban counties over the past 20 years.

Trump is not going to win Delaware County. Nonetheless, the sentiments of some of the college-educated suburban voters who live here, who own small businesses, or who commute to work in the city of Philadelphia are important in understanding if Biden is hitting his audience.

This is the challenge of 2024 and is very similar to what people experienced in 2016 when everyone who turned on the network news or the cable networks spent the whole summer and up until Election Day believing that Hillary Clinton was going to win.

Yet those of us reporting about what we heard and saw and experienced on the ground thought, “Wait a minute, the liberal media aren’t telling the entire story nor focusing on the voters who would decide the election.”
. . .
But polling done by ABC News after the speech showed 29% said that he had done better than they expected, 12% said it was worse than expected, and 24% said it was exactly what they expected.

A whopping 35% said they did not read, see, or hear about the address.

When you dig deeper into the poll, voters gave Biden abysmal marks on the economy, inflation, crime, and immigration, with Biden trailing Trump anywhere from 6 to 16 percentage points on those issues.

The misguided media narrative shows the importance of watching the people who will turn this election one way or another, rather than the people who share the media’s worldview.
. . .
A HarrisX/Forbes overnight poll released Tuesday, five days after the address, showed that the speech did indeed land flat with voters with a whopping 61% of them saying his performance was inadequate. Fifty-nine percent said it served to divide the country further.