• Please be sure to read the rules and adhere to them. Some banned members have complained that they are not spammers. But they spammed us. Some even tried to redirect our members to other forums. Duh. Be smart. Read the rules and adhere to them and we will all get along just fine. Cheers. :beer: Link to the rules: https://www.forumsforums.com/threads/forum-rules-info.2974/

2024 the year of the Successful Farm Revolts (finally)

Melensdad

Jerk in a Hawaiian Shirt & SNOWCAT Moderator
Staff member
It started about 5 years ago with Dutch farmers rising up against their government and has spread to a full European success as elected and unelected Euro-centric technocrats and bureaucrats, have seen their governments collapse, one after another. Germany and France are both in full collapse now. Over-regulation. Destructive policies that would kill family farms all led to the uprisings.

I see the TV show CLARKSON'S FARM on Amazon Prime as being a big mover of opinion in the UK. He, hysterically and clearly, shows the plight of the British family farmers. And this year there have finally been tractors taking over the British cities, but the UK is lagging behind Europe in the farmer revolt.

For different, but similar over-regulation, and central power grabbing reasons the US has seen the start of a total revolution, which will play out over the next 2 years. And it appears that Canada is in early stage failure now with Tredeau on the cliff's edge and teetering after he successfully destroyed a populist trucker's uprising a couple years ago. Neither the US nor Canada have had family farm revolts because our farms are now largely large commodity farms, too often owned by corporations, or smaller farmers, on leased land, that have 2nd jobs, and no real "farm" to call home. But the US and Canada have plenty of pissed off citizens due to similar over-regulation schemes and the populations are pissed off.

Javier Mellei, in Argentina is showing the world that regulations can be cut, deficits can be cut and bureaucrats can be eliminated.

2025 could be a very interesting year for Europe, and both North and South Americas. In large part because of family farmers who have taken their tractors into town and shut down the cities of Europe.

Full story from SPIKED!


The revenge of the real economy

In 2024, Europe's farmers dealt a righteous blow to the green elites.

https://www.spiked-online.com/author/tim-black/
The revenge of the real economy
Share
Topics World
Want to read spiked ad-free? Become a spiked supporter.
Europe’s governing classes have long been estranged from the real economy – from the world of production, industry and agriculture. To these green-hued technocrats, the economy appears as little more than a set of figures on a spreadsheet, to be regulated and managed towards a ‘better’, ‘greener’ future. To be redesigned according to a schedule of abstract, arbitrary Net Zero targets. All the while, the actual activity of making the stuff we need and use everyday – from energy to food – has remained out of sight and, above all, out of mind.
That was until this year, when farmers from across Europe took to the streets to protest against measures that threaten their very existence. In doing so, they finally brought this aloof political class face-to-face with the destructive consequences of their policies.
The first stirrings of this continent-wide farmers’ revolt were glimpsed five years ago in the Netherlands. The Dutch government’s plans to cut nitrogen emissions by 45 per cent across all industrial sectors, in order to meet EU-approved targets, might have sounded like a no-brainer for the environment. Yet, in practice, it threatened to devastate Dutch agriculture. Cutting nitrogen emissions would mean vastly reducing the use of fertiliser and slaughtering nearly half of the nation’s livestock. Faced by such a monumental act of self-harm, Dutch farmers understandably fought back. They staged massive protests in 2019, and again in 2021 and 2022, using their tractors to block roads, railways and bridges.
These protests proved overwhelmingly popular, winning the backing of many Dutch citizens well beyond the agricultural industry. Indeed, a farmers’ upstart political party, the Farmers’ and Citizens Movement (BBB), actually won provincial elections in 2023, before picking up several seats later that year in the Dutch General Election.
Elsewhere in Europe, this latent conflict between the policies of a distant ruling class and the needs of those who work the land has exploded into political warfare.
In Germany, fury was sparked by plans to abolish tax breaks on agricultural diesel, and introduce new taxes on farming vehicles. By early January, 30,000 agricultural workers and 5,000 tractors were rounding off a week of nationwide protests by laying siege to Berlin, bringing life in the German capital to a standstill.
A couple of weeks later, French farmers followed suit. Citing the strangulating effect of EU regulations, alongside the prospect of an end to agricultural-diesel subsidies, French farmers decided to blockade Paris, Lyon, Limoges and Toulouse. Days later, Irish farmers, in a show of solidarity with their continental counterparts, staged a series of tractor and truck convoys through towns and along motorways.
At the same time, farmers in Greece were forcing roads to close in protest against the government’s inaction over weather-inflicted damage to property and crops. And in Romania, they were filling the streets with their agricultural vehicles over exorbitant fuel and insurance prices.
By the end of January, it was possible to speak of a Europe-wide farmers’ revolt. Tens of thousands of people were clogging up the arteries of their nations’ roads in protest against the policies of their out-of-touch leaders. The farmers’ specific grievances, from agricultural-diesel taxes to fertiliser limits, may have varied between countries. But there has been little mistaking the common root to their fury – namely, the EU’s green agenda.
In the name of achieving the EU’s target of Net Zero by 2050, the key commitment of the 2020 European Green Deal, national elites have been slowly choking the agricultural industry for years now. They have been issuing demands from up on high, from reductions in fertiliser use to limits on pesticides, in order to meet the EU’s decarbonisation timetable. And this year, those whose livelihoods were about to be decimated at the stroke of a regulators’ pen decided it was time to push back.
They have had successes too. The desperately unpopular German government announced a delay to planned cuts in subsidies for agricultural fuel, and French farmers extracted millions of euros in additional grants. But no sooner had Europe’s wounded political elites temporarily quelled protest in one member state, then farmers rose up again somewhere else, from Portugal to Belgium. This shows that the fundamental tension between the interests of Europe’s technocratic elites and the needs of the real economy is not going away.
Indeed, the farmers’ revolt has now even spread to Britain. Over the past couple of months, thousands have staged large, quietly angry demonstrations in London, in protest against the Labour government’s plan to change so-called agricultural property relief (APR). The change to APR would subject farmers inheriting land and property worth over £1million to inheritance tax at an effective rate of 20 per cent. This poses a serious problem for those working the land. Not least because, thanks to the harsh economic realities of farming, from price-squeezing supermarkets to the rapid rise in fertiliser and feed costs, many farmers may be asset rich on paper, but are very much cash poor. Farmers will struggle to pay this new tax without having to sell off swathes of their farmland – something that will impact not only the landowners, but also the many workers and communities that work and rely on that farmland.
British farmers’ grievances may differ from those of farmers in the Netherlands, France and Germany. But like their continental counterparts, farmers here are confronting the same problem – an aloof governing elite intent on imposing livelihood-destroying measures on whole swathes of the productive economy.
For too long, Europe’s political elites – blissful in their ignorance of the reality and necessity of productive work and the communities that rely on it – have been getting away with purposely limiting our means of production. But no more. In 2024, the real economy started to exact its revenge.
 
Last edited:
As for Canada, and their upcoming governmental realignment, there is some hope for the citizens, but plenty of peril as well. If the left and the far left unite, things could remain the same. There are challengers on both the left and the right while his own party seems to be chaos, but push come to shove, a coalition of left and far left would likely form if the right can't win a real majority.

FULL STORY at John Solomon's JUST THE NEWS website, but here is a good bit of info:




Canada’s Trudeau imperiled by his liberal policies long before Trump reemerged

Trudeau's popularity among voters began to decline as far back as November 2020, roughly nine months into the COVID-19 pandemic.

Canada Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's grip on his government and stewardship of a trusted, decades-long relationship with the neighboring U.S. was in trouble long before President-elect Donald Trump last month essentially threatened a 25% tariff that he justified amid persistent drug trafficking and illegal migration along the countries' mutual boarder.
Trudeau's popularity among voters began to decline as far back as November 2020, roughly nine months into the COVID-19 pandemic, according to a Canadian independent research-tracker poll.
Voters reelected Trudeau in 2021, but his Liberal Party of Canada failed to win a majority of votes in Parliament. And he has since faced criticism from the Conservative opposition for some of his pandemic and post-pandemic policies. Among the concerns are high unemployment, the escalating cost of housing and inflation that reached 8% after the pandemic.
By the time Trump laid down the tariff threat in late-November, Trudeau's approval rating at about 28%, while his disapproval rating was roughly 67%.
Trump reemerging to be the next leader of the world's largest economy appeared to just make matters worse – with Canadian Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland resigning after the tariff threat.
Neither meeting yielded immediate results. And before Friday ended, Conservative lawmakers in Canada's House of Commons said they could hold a non-confidence vote on Trudeau and his liberal government as early as Jan. 30.
The 53-year-old Trudeau has been in office since November 2015, and the odds of his government surviving until its 10 anniversary are extraordinarily slim.
Canadian law requires elections to take place by October, but there's also the likelihood Trudeau will resign before that time.
However it happens, the departure of Trudeau – the son of 1980s-era Canadian Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau – is likely to set the country up for months of turmoil, involving a fight over the leadership of Trudeau’s Liberal Party and jockeying for position among opposition parties in the lead-up to the next election.
Who could replace Trudeau? There’s no clear-cut favorite. But Freeland, 56, a former journalist whose resignation brought Trudeau’s problems to a head this month, could hold the key.
Before being named deputy prime minister in 2019 and finance minister a year later, she was minister of international trade, minister of foreign affairs, and minister of intergovernmental affairs (often overlapping) – all under Trudeau.
Freeland left Trudeau’s cabinet but has not formally pulled her support for his government. If she did that, she likely would have enough support in parliament to assure the government's collapse. She probably even has the inside track to replace Trudeau as leader of the Liberal Party, though gaining enough votes for the Liberals to hold onto power in the next election is far from certain.
At the polls, the Liberal’s stiffest challenge will come from Pierre Poilievre, the largely untested 45-year-old Conservative leader, who has been in Parliament nearly half his life. Polls show Poilievre with more than double Trudeau’s level of support. Meanwhile, Jagmeet Singh, an Indo-Canadian who is leading the call of a no-confidence vote, is polling about even with Trudeau, drawing votes from the far left. . . .
 
There's not a snowball's chance in h#$#ll of the NDP under Singh of forming Government or in any kind of coalition with the left .The Party with the most seats gets first chance to form government after an election and it looks like it will be a Conservative Government after the next election , barring a liberal miracle..lol.
As for Singh posturing with a no confidence vote ,he knows there is a very good chance the liberals will prorogue parliament ,basically stalling until the fall of an election. The NDP have no money and do not want an election .
 
link to article


In my opinion as long as the public is aware of the the product status they should be able to make the decision on what they consume.
In my opinion the Amish goods are better for you than processed foods by large corporation's.
I'm waiting to see ow this pans out because I'm a regular Amish customer I cant grow produce for what they sell them for and they usually last longer taste better than store bought products.

LANCASTER COUNTY, Pa. —
Dozens of people showed up at the Lancaster County courthouse on Thursday to support a farmer who state officials say is endangering public health by selling raw milk without a permit.

The Department of Agriculture is seeking an injunction against Amish farmer Amos Miller to stop him from producing and selling raw milk products.


Advertisement
After a hearing that lasted more than four hours, a judge deferred the ruling but questioned the defense as to why Miller doesn't get a permit.

Investigators with the Agriculture Department and Pennsylvania State Police raided Miller's farm in Upper Leacock Township in January and seized raw milk products.

A prosecutor with the attorney general's office called agriculture employees to testify that a quarter of the more than three dozen samples taken showed listeria contamination.

The prosecution also said three illnesses diagnosed as E. coli across the country — in New York, Michigan and Texas — have been linked to Miller's products.

Robert Barnes, counsel for Amos Miller says this just isn't right.



https://www.wgal.com/article/girl-scout-cookies-season-flavor-retirement/63361522
"People want food the Amish way, the Amos Miller way, not the PDA way. Why are we spending taxpayers' dollars, harassing a small Amish farm that makes food that people are begging to have, whose lives depend on it, " Barnes said.

The defense called witnesses from out of state who claimed raw milk had helped their health problems. That included an expectant mother and her autistic son.

Both sides brought witnesses to argue over whether raw milk or pasteurized is more beneficial.

Outside the courtroom, more than 100 supporters gathered to protest against what they see as government overreach and an infringement of rights.

"If it's the person's choice that wants to purchase it, if that person's willing to sell it, I don't feel that there's a need for a permit," Kathy Houston of Stewartstown said.

"We've been consuming it for quite some time, and it's very helpful for us. We're supporting him 100% for the freedom of food," Doug Jolly of New Jersey said.

State law prohibits selling raw milk products without a permit, while federal laws prohibit selling raw milk products across state lines.
 
Top