White House + Jan 6 Committee colluded with Georgia prosecutor against Trump

[Melensdad]

Want to talk conspiracy theories?

Or how about just factual information. . .

Seems the Georgia Prosecutor, Fani Willis, has been pretty busy. Not only did she employ her secret lover to investigate Trump, but she also met with the Biden White House and with the clearly biased January 6th Committee.

Has the US devolved so far that we really are no better than a 'banana republic' that allows for the arrest and prosecution, on trumped up charges, often fabricated charges, of political rivals? It sure seems like that is what is happening.

We saw 50 members of the FBI, CIA, NSA basically lie about the Hunter Biden laptop, claiming it "looks like" Russian disinformation to keep that story, which is obviously true, out to the media just before the election.

Biden's administration, in the form of the Justice Department, has clearly gone after Roman Catholics, parents who questions school boards about LGBTQ+ policies, Pro-Life organizations and others. The January 6th Committee suppressed evidence, highly produced and edited other evidence, and basically "threw the book" at the Capital protestors. All the while this stuff was going on, nobody bothered to prosecute the George Floyd rioters who caused a billion or two in damage.

Honestly people need to go to jail over this crap. And those people can start with the 50 who knowingly signed off on the Hunter Biden laptop, the Congresspeople on the Jan 6 Committee, a goodly number of people in the upper levels of our Justice Department and now several purely political prosecutors.

Collusion!? Jan. 6 Committee Inserted Itself Into Fani Willis' Georgia Case Against Trump | ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

Collusion!? Jan. 6 Committee Inserted Itself Into Fani Willis' Georgia Case Against Trump​

In the spring of 2022, Georgia prosecutors investigating Donald Trump over his actions related to the 2020 election received an early boost from another set of investigators... the House Jan. 6 select committee.​

​

​

​

In mid-April of that year, Committee staff quietly met with attorneys working on the case in Fulton County for DA Fani Willis, right around the time she was preparing to convene a special grand jury investigation - during which she employed her alleged paramour, Nathan Wade, who would also coordinate with the Biden White Houseon their case.​

​

So - Fani coordinated with both the J6 committee and the White House, who helped them assemble their case against the former president.​

​

According to Politico, the Jan. 6 committee attorneys allowed the DA's team to review (but not keep) a 'limited set of evidence' they had gathered.​

​

Over the next few months, committee staff also had a series of phone calls with Willis’ team. They answered the prosecutors’ questions and shared insight on matters like Trump’s false electors gambit and his efforts to pressure Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger. Both of those ploys ultimately featured prominently in the criminal charges that Willis brought against Trump and his allies last summer.​

The contacts between the committee and Willis’ team also helped prosecutors prepare for interviews with key witnesses.​

The coordination between Willis' team and the J6 committee were described by two former committee officials on condition of anonymity - timing which has been corroborated by new court filings in Willis' case against Trump and 14 co-defendants for their alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election.​

​

Interestingly, the J6 committee helped Willis' team in its early stages while simultaneously rejecting DOJ requests for material in a separate criminal probe of Trump's actions surrounding the 2020 election - because the committee was worried that federal prosecutors might have been required to disclose the committee's carefully curated evidence in ongoing criminal cases related to January 6th.​

​

​

​

Willis rejected congressional GOP efforts to disclose her team's contact with the Jan. 6 committee, calling their investigation an affront to "well-established principles of federalism and separation of powers."​

​

"You cannot — and will not — be provided access to any non-public information about this," she told the House Judiciary Committee in December in a letter obtained by the outlet.​

​

Jan. 6 committee chairman Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) had previously described “staff-level contacts” between his panel and Fulton County prosecutors. In early April 2022 — nearly two weeks before the panel’s staff met with Willis’ team — Thompson told reporters he wasn’t aware of how extensive those contacts were. And on Wednesday, Thompson told POLITICO that he did not know about the in-person visit that spring.​

Willis’ office did not respond to requests for comment. A former Jan. 6 committee aide said in a statement: “As the January 6th Committee’s final report transparently stated, the Committee shared information — all of which is now public — with prosecutors conducting concurrent, independent investigations.” -Politico​

After 18 months, the Jan. 6 committee amassed hundreds of witness interviews which have become key evidence in Trump's legal matters.​

​

According to Sol Wisenberg, a former prosecutor working on Ken Starr's probe of Bill Clinton, the nature of the cooperation between Willis' team and the J6 panel is unusual.​

​

"To me, that’s a highly unusual level of specific cooperation," he said, adding "They’re using what’s supposed to be a congressional investigation in aid of a prosecution."​

​

On Dec. 7, 2021, Willis asked Bernie Thompson's office for help with her Trump probe, and wanted to meet in person. Four months later, her team visited DC and met with committee staff. Nathan Wade, Fani's alleged lover, documented the meeting in an invoice he submitted to her office.​

​

"Team meeting; Conf w/Jan 6; Research legal issues to prep interv," reads one line item related to his invoice for work spanning April 18 to April 21, 2022. Two former committee officials told Politico that Willis' team met with committee staff in April 2022, which included some of Willis' top prosecutors (including Wade and Donald Wakeford).​

​

The invoice from Wade became public knowledge in a Monday motion to dismiss filed by an attorney for Mike Roman, a former 2020 Trump campaign aide and a co-defendant in the Fulton County case. Roman's attorney also alleged that Willis and Wade have a romantic relationship, and that Wade's contract with her office poses a conflict of interest.​

​

In the meeting, members of Willis’ team viewed some of the committee’s evidence on Georgia-specific matters, including Trump’s efforts to pressure local officials and the fake electors’ actions in the state.​

Committee staff had more calls with the prosecutors over the following months, including discussions of their conversations with witnesses whom the prosecutors were planning to interview. The calls helped prosecutors prepare for those interviews. One witness they discussed was Pat Cipollone, Trump’s final White House counsel, who spoke with committee investigators just days before the meeting with Willis’ team. Cipollone reportedly sat for a formal interview with Willis about six months later.​

The topics WIllis' team huddled with the J6 Committee over became prominent features of her indictment against Trump et al.​

​

Meanwhile, Congressional Republicans have recently begun to seek more details about contacts made between Willis and the committee.​

 

[Melensdad]

And we have so much more.

But all of it boils down to corruption and collusion.

Hunter Biden's art dealer has confessed that President Joe Biden met with him IN THE WHITE HOUSE to discuss the sale of Hunter's "artwork" and who purchased it.

There is ample evidence that President Joe Biden, despite his denials, was involved in the influence peddling scheme (quid pro quo, etc) that was cooked up by Hunter Biden and somehow funneled money through a dozen or more shell companies from foreign governments and oligarchs into the bank accounts of Joe, Hunter and other family members.

Corruption Charges (Still) Loom As Major Barrier To Biden Reelection In 2024: I&I/TIPP Poll

The president's denials have been contradicted by a continuous stream of revelations.

tippinsights.com

FULL STORY at the link above, and there is much more than I am posting below

Corruption Charges (Still) Loom As Major Barrier To Biden Reelection In 2024: I&I/TIPP Poll​

The president's denials have been contradicted by a continuous stream of revelations.​

Terry JonesJanuary 15, 2024 . 6:13 AM​

​

Official White House Photo by Adam Schultz​

​

You won't find this research in corporate media's polls. Please consider becoming a paid subscriber to support our work.​

Much of the discussion over whether President Joe Biden will drop out of the 2024 presidential race centers on his increasingly obvious age-related issues. But a potentially more serious problem awaits Biden, the latest I&I/TIPP Poll suggests: Strong evidence that he illegally profited from public office while vice president under former President Barack Obama.​

​

At 81 years of age and with painful difficulties handling his official duties, Biden's waning mental acuity has become a serious issue. But while age and a record low approval rating are major impediments to Biden's reelection, the pile of evidence amassed in Congress' investigation into Biden's and son Hunter's legally questionable business dealings could prove lethal to his presidency.​

​

I&I/TIPP posed the following question to U.S. voters in August of 2023: "A congressional committee claims it has strong evidence that President Biden and his family took millions of dollars in bribes from foreign nations. If those claims turn out to be true, President Biden should:"​

​

Voters were given a choice of possible answers: "Resign immediately," "Be impeached and removed from office," "Be allowed to finish his term in office, but not run again," "Run again in 2024, regardless of the findings," and "Not sure."​

​

A strong majority of 67% in our poll suggested that President Joe Biden should either be impeached (43%) or resign immediately (24%) if the charges prove true. Just 15% said Biden should “Be allowed to finish his term in office, but not run again,” and another 8% said “Run again in 2024, regardless of the findings.” One in six (17%) weren’t sure.​

​

The most recent I&I/TIPP national online poll was taken from Jan. 3-5 included 1,401 adults, with a +/-2.6 percentage-point margin of error.​

​

Have things changed since mid-summer? Not much.​

​

As of January 2024, 62% say Biden should either resign (25%) or be impeached (37%) for his misdeeds, with a plurality of Democrats (42%) and strong majorities of Republicans (84%) and independents (62%) agreeing.​

​

​

It should be noted that of the 36 demographic groups we routinely track each month, apart from Democrats (44%), in January only African-American voters (41%) and self-described liberals (46%) were below 50% on the "resign/impeach" questions.​

​

Of the remaining 38% of the responses, which include only the least-punitive responses, 17% said Biden should be allowed to finish his term, but not run again, while just 10% said he should be able to run, regardless of what Congress finds. Another 11% said they were "not sure."​

​

I&I/TIPP asked one more question: “Do you support or oppose the House of Representatives launching an impeachment inquiry against President Biden.”​

​

A clear majority, 54%, said they either supported such a move “strongly” (36%) or “somewhat” (18%), while 33% opposed it either strongly (20%) or somewhat (13%). Another 13% said they were “not sure.”​

​

​

These questions aren't moot. While the bad news about Biden's possible misconduct subsided during the holiday season, it's come roaring back in the New Year. And, if anything, the growing evidence of possible Biden family corruption has only grown in the past half year.​

​

House Republicans threatened a contempt of Congress charge against Hunter Biden for refusing to testify. But Biden let it be known through his lawyer on Jan. 12 that he would testify behind closed doors if a new subpoena were issued, asserting that the earlier subpoena for him to appear before lawmakers was "legally invalid."​

​

The revival of attention to the troubling evidence of at least $21 million paid to Biden family members by foreign governments and government-allied businesses is likely to further damage Biden's "middle-class Joe" persona in the upcoming election.​

​

Right now, the Biden administration's position seems to be "ignore it, and maybe it will go away."​

​

"Of the 337 scandal-related questions that White House reporters asked, (Karine) Jean-Pierre provided a definitive answer to just eight of them (2.37%)," senior research analyst and Media Editor Bill D'Agostino of the conservative-leaning Media Research Center asserted in a recent study. "This figure tracks very closely with our findings from the first half of 2023, in which the press secretary answered only six out of 252 questions (2.38%)."​

 

[tommu56]

And we have so much more.

But all of it boils down to corruption and collusion.

Hunter Biden's art dealer has confessed that President Joe Biden met with him IN THE WHITE HOUSE to discuss the sale of Hunter's "artwork" and who purchased it.

There is ample evidence that President Joe Biden, despite his denials, was involved in the influence peddling scheme (quid pro quo, etc) that was cooked up by Hunter Biden and somehow funneled money through a dozen or more shell companies from foreign governments and oligarchs into the bank accounts of Joe, Hunter and other family members.

Corruption Charges (Still) Loom As Major Barrier To Biden Reelection In 2024: I&I/TIPP Poll

The president's denials have been contradicted by a continuous stream of revelations.

tippinsights.com

FULL STORY at the link above, and there is much more than I am posting below

Corruption Charges (Still) Loom As Major Barrier To Biden Reelection In 2024: I&I/TIPP Poll​

The president's denials have been contradicted by a continuous stream of revelations.​

Terry JonesJanuary 15, 2024 . 6:13 AM​

​

Official White House Photo by Adam Schultz​

​

You won't find this research in corporate media's polls. Please consider becoming a paid subscriber to support our work.​

Much of the discussion over whether President Joe Biden will drop out of the 2024 presidential race centers on his increasingly obvious age-related issues. But a potentially more serious problem awaits Biden, the latest I&I/TIPP Poll suggests: Strong evidence that he illegally profited from public office while vice president under former President Barack Obama.​

​

At 81 years of age and with painful difficulties handling his official duties, Biden's waning mental acuity has become a serious issue. But while age and a record low approval rating are major impediments to Biden's reelection, the pile of evidence amassed in Congress' investigation into Biden's and son Hunter's legally questionable business dealings could prove lethal to his presidency.​

​

I&I/TIPP posed the following question to U.S. voters in August of 2023: "A congressional committee claims it has strong evidence that President Biden and his family took millions of dollars in bribes from foreign nations. If those claims turn out to be true, President Biden should:"​

​

Voters were given a choice of possible answers: "Resign immediately," "Be impeached and removed from office," "Be allowed to finish his term in office, but not run again," "Run again in 2024, regardless of the findings," and "Not sure."​

​

A strong majority of 67% in our poll suggested that President Joe Biden should either be impeached (43%) or resign immediately (24%) if the charges prove true. Just 15% said Biden should “Be allowed to finish his term in office, but not run again,” and another 8% said “Run again in 2024, regardless of the findings.” One in six (17%) weren’t sure.​

​

The most recent I&I/TIPP national online poll was taken from Jan. 3-5 included 1,401 adults, with a +/-2.6 percentage-point margin of error.​

​

Have things changed since mid-summer? Not much.​

​

As of January 2024, 62% say Biden should either resign (25%) or be impeached (37%) for his misdeeds, with a plurality of Democrats (42%) and strong majorities of Republicans (84%) and independents (62%) agreeing.​

​

​

It should be noted that of the 36 demographic groups we routinely track each month, apart from Democrats (44%), in January only African-American voters (41%) and self-described liberals (46%) were below 50% on the "resign/impeach" questions.​

​

Of the remaining 38% of the responses, which include only the least-punitive responses, 17% said Biden should be allowed to finish his term, but not run again, while just 10% said he should be able to run, regardless of what Congress finds. Another 11% said they were "not sure."​

​

I&I/TIPP asked one more question: “Do you support or oppose the House of Representatives launching an impeachment inquiry against President Biden.”​

​

A clear majority, 54%, said they either supported such a move “strongly” (36%) or “somewhat” (18%), while 33% opposed it either strongly (20%) or somewhat (13%). Another 13% said they were “not sure.”​

​

​

These questions aren't moot. While the bad news about Biden's possible misconduct subsided during the holiday season, it's come roaring back in the New Year. And, if anything, the growing evidence of possible Biden family corruption has only grown in the past half year.​

​

House Republicans threatened a contempt of Congress charge against Hunter Biden for refusing to testify. But Biden let it be known through his lawyer on Jan. 12 that he would testify behind closed doors if a new subpoena were issued, asserting that the earlier subpoena for him to appear before lawmakers was "legally invalid."​

​

The revival of attention to the troubling evidence of at least $21 million paid to Biden family members by foreign governments and government-allied businesses is likely to further damage Biden's "middle-class Joe" persona in the upcoming election.​

​

Right now, the Biden administration's position seems to be "ignore it, and maybe it will go away."​

​

"Of the 337 scandal-related questions that White House reporters asked, (Karine) Jean-Pierre provided a definitive answer to just eight of them (2.37%)," senior research analyst and Media Editor Bill D'Agostino of the conservative-leaning Media Research Center asserted in a recent study. "This figure tracks very closely with our findings from the first half of 2023, in which the press secretary answered only six out of 252 questions (2.38%)."​

I'm in the camp if he is guilty he needs to be burnt on a stake in my opinion (I guess that removes me from the jury pool)

 

[m1west]

Want to talk conspiracy theories?

Or how about just factual information. . .

Seems the Georgia Prosecutor, Fani Willis, has been pretty busy. Not only did she employ her secret lover to investigate Trump, but she also met with the Biden White House and with the clearly biased January 6th Committee.

Has the US devolved so far that we really are no better than a 'banana republic' that allows for the arrest and prosecution, on trumped up charges, often fabricated charges, of political rivals? It sure seems like that is what is happening.

We saw 50 members of the FBI, CIA, NSA basically lie about the Hunter Biden laptop, claiming it "looks like" Russian disinformation to keep that story, which is obviously true, out to the media just before the election.

Biden's administration, in the form of the Justice Department, has clearly gone after Roman Catholics, parents who questions school boards about LGBTQ+ policies, Pro-Life organizations and others. The January 6th Committee suppressed evidence, highly produced and edited other evidence, and basically "threw the book" at the Capital protestors. All the while this stuff was going on, nobody bothered to prosecute the George Floyd rioters who caused a billion or two in damage.

Honestly people need to go to jail over this crap. And those people can start with the 50 who knowingly signed off on the Hunter Biden laptop, the Congresspeople on the Jan 6 Committee, a goodly number of people in the upper levels of our Justice Department and now several purely political prosecutors.

Collusion!? Jan. 6 Committee Inserted Itself Into Fani Willis' Georgia Case Against Trump | ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

Collusion!? Jan. 6 Committee Inserted Itself Into Fani Willis' Georgia Case Against Trump​

In the spring of 2022, Georgia prosecutors investigating Donald Trump over his actions related to the 2020 election received an early boost from another set of investigators... the House Jan. 6 select committee.​

​

​

​

In mid-April of that year, Committee staff quietly met with attorneys working on the case in Fulton County for DA Fani Willis, right around the time she was preparing to convene a special grand jury investigation - during which she employed her alleged paramour, Nathan Wade, who would also coordinate with the Biden White Houseon their case.​

​

So - Fani coordinated with both the J6 committee and the White House, who helped them assemble their case against the former president.​

​

According to Politico, the Jan. 6 committee attorneys allowed the DA's team to review (but not keep) a 'limited set of evidence' they had gathered.​

​

The coordination between Willis' team and the J6 committee were described by two former committee officials on condition of anonymity - timing which has been corroborated by new court filings in Willis' case against Trump and 14 co-defendants for their alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election.​

​

Interestingly, the J6 committee helped Willis' team in its early stages while simultaneously rejecting DOJ requests for material in a separate criminal probe of Trump's actions surrounding the 2020 election - because the committee was worried that federal prosecutors might have been required to disclose the committee's carefully curated evidence in ongoing criminal cases related to January 6th.​

​

​

​

Willis rejected congressional GOP efforts to disclose her team's contact with the Jan. 6 committee, calling their investigation an affront to "well-established principles of federalism and separation of powers."​

​

"You cannot — and will not — be provided access to any non-public information about this," she told the House Judiciary Committee in December in a letter obtained by the outlet.​

​

After 18 months, the Jan. 6 committee amassed hundreds of witness interviews which have become key evidence in Trump's legal matters.​

​

According to Sol Wisenberg, a former prosecutor working on Ken Starr's probe of Bill Clinton, the nature of the cooperation between Willis' team and the J6 panel is unusual.​

​

"To me, that’s a highly unusual level of specific cooperation," he said, adding "They’re using what’s supposed to be a congressional investigation in aid of a prosecution."​

​

On Dec. 7, 2021, Willis asked Bernie Thompson's office for help with her Trump probe, and wanted to meet in person. Four months later, her team visited DC and met with committee staff. Nathan Wade, Fani's alleged lover, documented the meeting in an invoice he submitted to her office.​

​

"Team meeting; Conf w/Jan 6; Research legal issues to prep interv," reads one line item related to his invoice for work spanning April 18 to April 21, 2022. Two former committee officials told Politico that Willis' team met with committee staff in April 2022, which included some of Willis' top prosecutors (including Wade and Donald Wakeford).​

​

The invoice from Wade became public knowledge in a Monday motion to dismiss filed by an attorney for Mike Roman, a former 2020 Trump campaign aide and a co-defendant in the Fulton County case. Roman's attorney also alleged that Willis and Wade have a romantic relationship, and that Wade's contract with her office poses a conflict of interest.​

​

The topics WIllis' team huddled with the J6 Committee over became prominent features of her indictment against Trump et al.​

​

Meanwhile, Congressional Republicans have recently begun to seek more details about contacts made between Willis and the committee.​

Yes we are fast approaching banana republic status, if not there looking for a parking space.

 

[Patriot]

This is what is meant by the "deep state," which the left claims is just a fear mongering term used by the right. It is the collusion and coordination, employed by the power elites, mostly on the left, but also establishment types from both parties, to keep themselves in power, to gain more power, and to get and stay rich. The reason they go after Trump so hard is because he, more than anyone in modern times, has confronted and exposed this reality for Americans to see. It is the creeping power of the state at the expense of the people, but more are waking up to it, and that is why the GOP is increasingly becoming a populist party. We the People still matters to us!