When Being Pro-Life Didn’t Make You a RepublicanRobert Tracy McKenzie

[FrancSevin]

When Being Pro-Life Didn’t Make You a Republican​

Robert Tracy McKenzie
Journeying back to America before Roe v. Wade is like entering The Twilight Zone.

Christianity Today December, 2015 issue

A look back at 1970's attitudes. And where we are today

Joey Guidone
Historians have a favorite saying: “The past is like a foreign country.” When we travel there, we meet people who think and act very differently. We return home with a new perspective, recognizing how much we take for granted, how much is far from inevitable.

Defenders of the Unborn: The Pro-Life Movement before Roe v. Wade​

Daniel K. Williams (Author)

OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS
380 pages
$33.96
For a powerful illustration of this truth, look no further than Daniel K. Williams’s masterful new book, Defenders of the Unborn: The Pro-Life Movement before Roe v. Wade (Oxford University Press). When readers turn the final page, they may feel like they have visited not just a different country, but a different universe.

The Twilight Zone​

When the Supreme Court decided Roe v. Wade in 1973, only one in six of today’s Americans were adults. The rest of us have grown up in a later age. In the world we know, abortion has always been a constitutionally protected right. It has always pitted Republicans against Democrats, conservatives against liberals, Christians against secularists.
It still does but the players have changed.

This is an old and very long book review but, given the subject as it relates to the recent election, worth the time.

When Being Pro-Life Didn't Make You a Republican - Christianity Today

Journeying back to America before Roe v. Wade is like entering The Twilight Zone.

www.christianitytoday.com

 

[FrancSevin]

I saw on the news tonight that on November 6th, post election, morethan10,000 women ordered abortion pills. Usually, the daily tally is about 600. Apparently, the fear mongers got to these women and convinced them Trump was going to ban abortions nationwide.

First, he has adamantly claimed otherwise.
Second, he has better things to do right now.

Most importantly, Trump praised the revocation of Roe V Wade because it was un-Constitutional. The Federal government has no Constitution authority on this subject. Not one word coma or period in that document addresses Abortion in any way shape or form. Which is the point. And is why he , our next President, complements the SCOTUS for correcting their error.

It is a state's rights issue. Therefore, there is no legal way for the President, i,e; Donald J Trump, or the federal government, i.e.; Congress, to enact a nationwide ban on abortion. If Congress tried to do it, I would imagine President Trump would veto the bill.

So, from where comes this BS argument and why?