Tesla right behind F-150 for best selling vehicle in the last 9 months

The lovely Mrs_Bob and I considered one of the Model Ys for her. It is certainly a unique 'SUV' with lots of practical features. Honestly it came pretty darn close to filling our needs. From the looks standpoint the Hyundai Ionic 5 is, subjectively nicer. But the Model Y has plenty of positive features. I can certainly believe it is a top selling vehicle, I see them everywhere I drive when I go into the Suburban areas.
 
all that indicates to me is . . .
in the general population, no one can afford a new care anymore.

people who can afford the price tag on a Tesla, , , their problems are not in sync with the Ford population.
Actually the Tesla prices are DROPPING and, at least some models, are very competitive with ICE cars of similar size and features. Of course, feature comparison is pretty subjective in areas like looks, etc.

I also suspect that many people simply can't afford to buy ANY new car, not just limited to the EVs that typically command a somewhat higher price tag to comparable ICE cars. The "average" car on the road today is roughly 12 years old, that is a record, which could be due to better build quality or it could be do the unaffordability of all new vehicles?

Based on numerous published media reports, we know is that ALL electric vehicle sales comprise less than 10% of new car sales. We also know that Tesla sells the bulk of the EVs sold in the US. We also know that Ford, VW, GM, Hyundai are all saying that their EVs sit on dealership lots, on average, twice as long as ICE vehicles. We also know that many legacy dealers are refusing to accept new EV shipments due to slow sales. We also know that Cadillac has sold ALL its production for the new LYRIC, but it has very low production numbers. We know that the Honda/GM joint partnership to build "affordable" EVs has been terminated and that FORD is cutting back, to the tune of BILLIONS, its investments in EVs.
 
Sales may not be quite what people anticipated. But they are growing every month. I'm not saying they're the answer, there are times I second guess my purchase. But sales are up. Remember there's a lot of ice vehicle sitting on the lots also.


 
  • Like
Reactions: Doc
I think Ev's have gotten to the point it is no longer a purchase of conscience to save the planet but whether or not they fit the lifestyle of the buyer. Thye are arguably at a price point that is competitive with IC vehicles but still must past the test of viability and cohesiveness with the life style of the buyer.
That is where we should be with EV's vrs IC products in the marketplace.

Unfortunately, our government has put its thumb on the scales. There is where I have conflict..

Right now, My wife has a Pacifica. She could use the model "Y" as her only trips are to the school, 1 mile away for Madison, and work at GM, a 15 mile trip. For everything else we have a 2002 Jeep Cherokee and two one-ton Dodge trucks from the seventies. His and hers.
Olso two Chrysler Crossfires. His and hers.

I dare anyone to try and talk her out of her Pacifica.
I'm keeping the Crossfires for coffins.

At 76 years old, I dare anyone to try and talk me into being practical. The sex is too good so, she keeps the Pacifica. I'd sell the trucks first but, no EV's for some time to come.
 
Based on numerous published media reports, we know is that ALL electric vehicle sales comprise less than 10% of new car sales. We also know that Tesla sells the bulk of the EVs sold in the US. We also know that Ford, VW, GM, Hyundai are all saying that their EVs sit on dealership lots, on average, twice as long as ICE vehicles. We also know that many legacy dealers are refusing to accept new EV shipments due to slow sales. We also know that Cadillac has sold ALL its production for the new LYRIC, but it has very low production numbers. We know that the Honda/GM joint partnership to build "affordable" EVs has been terminated and that FORD is cutting back, to the tune of BILLIONS, its investments in EVs.
We also know Tesla is going to set another production and sales number for 2023. Sine Legacy is going soft on EV's I ony expect Tesla's market share to increase.
My sources state 12% was this year's percentage of the auto market overall. Next year It is expected to grow to nearly 20% at 18%
For Tessla this means a large number of cars. It is about cost per mile for me, and they have it down.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Doc
Sales may not be quite what people anticipated. But they are growing every month. I'm not saying they're the answer, there are times I second guess my purchase. But sales are up. Remember there's a lot of ice vehicle sitting on the lots also.


Dealers here (greater Chicagoland and northern Indiana) have very LOW inventory levels.

I think it would be more accurate to say that vehicles are sitting on the lots longer than they used to sit. Which I think goes back to the "affordability" issue brought up by chowderman
 
We also know Tesla is going to set another production and sales number for 2023. Sine Legacy is going soft on EV's I ony expect Tesla's market share to increase.
My sources state 12% was this year's percentage of the auto market overall. Next year It is expected to grow to nearly 20% at 18%
For Tessla this means a large number of cars. It is about cost per mile for me, and they have it down.
I saw a report today on TV saying UNDER 10% for the total EV market in the US new car sales
This report, released this month, says it is lower.

According to the same link below, Tesla sold roughly 157,000 vehicles in Q3 of 2023, Hyundai, the next largest EV producer, sold roughly 30,000



Screenshot 2023-12-11 at 5.50.07 PM.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: Doc
I saw a report today on TV saying UNDER 10% for the total EV market in the US new car sales
This report, released this month, says it is lower.

According to the same link below, Tesla sold roughly 157,000 vehicles in Q3 of 2023, Hyundai, the next largest EV producer, sold roughly 30,000



View attachment 171803
The first sentence says will the others catch Tesla? :lmao:
That says it all. Words we have heard for years now. I get so tired of bull shit, don't know who pays the bill other than a left hater of Elon.

The truth is in the news btw. Legacy auto for now are scaling back production drastically because of lack of sales.

The numbers I trust are those insiders who I have posted many You Tubes on this forum. Obviously, you did not watch, then check them out.

Do you realize the left would love to drain Elon of his money? Kill him if they could get away with it too?

Elon has the same target Trump has on his back. 2024 all hell could break out as the desperation grows.

Propaganda against Elon and Tesla is everywhere, even in the equity markets. Vet your source. Find pro Telsa analyst.
In the time I have fallowed Tesla, these guys are honest, and know Tesla inside and out. All the others are throwing rocks of propaganda to bend public opinion to their mind set.

Yes it is that bad in our nation today. Most info on TV and the net is propaganda. Not many players can pull off such an extensive and this big of a propaganda Against our nation. The WEF, Clouse Schwab even says publicly he loves the Chinese system of control of their people. Now there are major players in unison attacking us every single day with propaganda.
 

The Future 500 Mile Cybertruck / Ford's Demand Freefall / Lucid's Newest Problem ⚡️​

23:45 min.

Electrified
Electrified


106K subscribers

I like this guy. Young and educated, married with a budding family . Just Listen a few minutes and become informed without the bull shit propaganda. In not very long you will realize this dude knows Tesla.

Since Elon bought Twitter there have been 13 lawsuits filed by federal agencies under the Biden administration. The left is trying everything in the book to frame Musk, cut him away and demonize him. All done with tax dollars.
 
Looks like FORD decided to cut their F150 Lightning production IN HALF.




Ford's "Test For EV Adoption" Fails: Carmaker Slashes Production Plans For Electric F-150 In Half

Less than a week after Elon Musk unveiled his apocalypse-surviving, Porsche-out-accelerating, bulletproof CyberTruck, Ford's EV effort is crashing on the Biden-administration ignited fire of unaffordability and high costs.
Having signaled in October during its Q3 earnings call plans to “adjust” production of its all-electric vehicles and delay about $12 billion in investments due to softening demand for higher-priced premium electric vehicles; a memo to suppliers - which was viewed and reported first tonight by Automotive News- indicated plans beginning in January to produce an average of about 1,600 Lightning trucks a week at its Rouge Electric Vehicle Center in Dearborn, Michigan.
Ford had planned for an annual production capacity of 150,000 Lightnings a year, or about 3,200 a week.
That means its production target for 2024 has been halved.
“We’ll continue to match production with customer demand,” a Ford spokeswoman said Monday.
In May 2021, during a flashy introduction, Ford CEO Jim Farley told reporters that the electric F-150 could serve as a proxy for how mainstream buyers will accept battery power.
“I am looking at this vehicle as a test for adoption for electric vehicles,” Farley said.
“We should all watch very carefully how this does in the market.”
It would appear Ford failed that test.
Obviously, while this could be an idiosyncratic F-150 issue, it does not bode well for overall EV adoption... and along with it, the Biden administration's plans to save the world.
The senior economist at FreedomWorks and former senior economic adviser to President Trump told Fox News in an interview.
"I'm here to tell you, if these trends continue, we're going to see the EV market become the next big flop because car buyers don't want them."
"The obvious lesson for the industry: you can’t bribe Americans to buy cars they don’t want. Given the all-in approach mentality for EVs at Ford and GM, it’s clear that Detroit never got this message," he wrote.
President Biden has set a goal of 50% of all new vehicles by 2030 being either EVs or plug-in hybrids.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Doc
I found this interesting:
"
Congress at the urging of the Biden administration agreed in 2021 to spend $7.5 billion to build tens of thousands of electric vehicle chargers across the country, aiming to appease anxious drivers while tackling climate change.
Two years later, the program has yet to install a single charger.
"

article in Politico
dateline: 12/05/2023 05:00 AM EST
 
Looks like FORD decided to cut their F150 Lightning production IN HALF.




Ford's "Test For EV Adoption" Fails: Carmaker Slashes Production Plans For Electric F-150 In Half

Less than a week after Elon Musk unveiled his apocalypse-surviving, Porsche-out-accelerating, bulletproof CyberTruck, Ford's EV effort is crashing on the Biden-administration ignited fire of unaffordability and high costs.
Having signaled in October during its Q3 earnings call plans to “adjust” production of its all-electric vehicles and delay about $12 billion in investments due to softening demand for higher-priced premium electric vehicles; a memo to suppliers - which was viewed and reported first tonight by Automotive News- indicated plans beginning in January to produce an average of about 1,600 Lightning trucks a week at its Rouge Electric Vehicle Center in Dearborn, Michigan.
Ford had planned for an annual production capacity of 150,000 Lightnings a year, or about 3,200 a week.
That means its production target for 2024 has been halved.
“We’ll continue to match production with customer demand,” a Ford spokeswoman said Monday.
In May 2021, during a flashy introduction, Ford CEO Jim Farley told reporters that the electric F-150 could serve as a proxy for how mainstream buyers will accept battery power.

It would appear Ford failed that test.
Obviously, while this could be an idiosyncratic F-150 issue, it does not bode well for overall EV adoption... and along with it, the Biden administration's plans to save the world.
The senior economist at FreedomWorks and former senior economic adviser to President Trump told Fox News in an interview.

President Biden has set a goal of 50% of all new vehicles by 2030 being either EVs or plug-in hybrids.
Production PLANS you made a click bait title even more so.
I would say it's more their gearing up for the t3, and also to see what the cyber truck sales numbers are. As ugly as it is, it's a serious contender. Month by month sales numbers on the lightning are up.
 
 
Ford sold a total of 144,000 vehicles according to the article. Record sales for the Electric LIGHTNING but still under 9000 F150/Lightnings sold. That seems pretty underwhelming in real terms. How much did they lose per truck they sold?
 
Ford sold a total of 144,000 vehicles according to the article. Record sales for the Electric LIGHTNING but still under 9000 F150/Lightnings sold. That seems pretty underwhelming in real terms. How much did they lose per truck they sold?
Reread the article. Half of what they sold in Nov were lightnings. Pretty good considering the F-150 is the top selling vehicle in the United States.
 
Reread the article. Half of what they sold in Nov were lightnings. Pretty good considering the F-150 is the top selling vehicle in the United States.
I did re-read it. I was wrong. I actually inflated the EV sales of Ford Lightnings in my prior post by DOUBLE.

After more careful reading, Ford sold a total of 144,400 vehicles.
Ford sold a total of 8958 Electric Vehicles.
Ford sold roughly 4393 Lightnings.
Ford sold roughly 4294 Mustang Mach Es.

That is very underwhelming.
 
I did re-read it. I was wrong. I actually inflated the EV sales of Ford Lightnings in my prior post by DOUBLE.

After more careful reading, Ford sold a total of 144,400 vehicles.
Ford sold a total of 8958 Electric Vehicles.
Ford sold roughly 4393 Lightnings.
Ford sold roughly 4294 Mustang Mach Es.

That is very underwhelming.
I did re-read it. I was wrong. I actually inflated the EV sales of Ford Lightnings in my prior post by DOUBLE.

After more careful reading, Ford sold a total of 144,400 vehicles.
Ford sold a total of 8958 Electric Vehicles.
Ford sold roughly 4393 Lightnings.
Ford sold roughly 4294 Mustang Mach Es.

That is very underwhelming.
, I think you need to reread it again. You're looking at November's numbers, not year numbers.
 
, I think you need to reread it again. You're looking at November's numbers, not year numbers.
The title of the article specially says "MONTH" in the title

The article link you posted claims that 4393 Ford Lightnings sold are "strong sales numbers".

Bear in mind the PRIOR article mentioned in this thread said that Ford was cutting production of LIGHTNINGHS down to 1600 per week, which is still more than they are selling per month.

Compared to Tesla, and also in real terms of production, this seems pretty underwhelming to me.

Quotations from the article: (these numbers are TOTAL vehicle sales not EV sales)
"1,243,695 new vehicles were sold in the U.S. in November, and Ford sold 144,453"

And right here are the TOTAL EV sales for Ford:
"However, Ford’s numbers are skyrocketing, especially with the F-150 Lightning, which increased in sales by 113 percent, which helped it capture its best month for EV sales as a company with 8,958."

And here are the LIGHTNING sales:
F-150 Lightning sales accounted for 4,393 units of the 8,958 it sold in November.

And here are the Mustang Mach E sales:
the Mustang Mach-E saw a 21.3 percent increase, too. Ford sold 4,294 for the month.
 
The title of the article specially says "MONTH" in the title
The article link you posted claims that 4393 Ford Lightnings sold are "strong sales numbers".

Quotations from the article: (these numbers are TOTAL vehicle sales not EV sales)
"1,243,695 new vehicles were sold in the U.S. in November, and Ford sold 144,453"

And right here are the TOTAL EV sales for Ford:
"However, Ford’s numbers are skyrocketing, especially with the F-150 Lightning, which increased in sales by 113 percent, which helped it capture its best month for EV sales as a company with 8,958."

And here are the LIGHTNING sales:
F-150 Lightning sales accounted for 4,393 units of the 8,958 it sold in November.

And here are the Mustang Mach E sales:
the Mustang Mach-E saw a 21.3 percent increase, too. Ford sold 4,294 for the month.
On the last two quotes. Please read the last word of each quote
Sorry my phone is playing tricks. Yes you understand month.
 
On the last two quotes. Please read the last word of each quote
I did. They refer to MONTHLY sales.

And as noted, your article that you linked talks about MONTHLY sales.

Clearly I don't understand your point.

But if a company that sells 144,400 units per month in total, and under 9000 of those are EVs, then that is a pretty small % of the total. That also seems to be in line with the lack of popularity of EVs right now in the eyes of consumers and that number also seems to be very near the national average of EVs sold as a percentage of total vehicles sold (6.2% of Ford's Sales). Looks like, based on a prior post in this thread, from the same source, that roughly 7% of all vehicles sold are EVs.
 
Yep, my phone was playing tricks and I was not getting everything downloaded for some reason. Unfortunately I'm still in the working class. My point was as stated earlier they can't cut production of something they haven't produced. They can cut production plans. They can cut pre-production. But you can't cut production numbers in half or any percentage if you're not producing that many in the first place.
 
The other side of the point is if that's a big if they keep the gains that they have been, that all adds up in a year.
 
Top