FrancSevin said:
The good news, $1.2 trillionin automatic cuts,,,unless they change their mind and ignore the legislation they wrote.
Ummm Well, they are already saying that they built it and they can unbuild it
http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/blog_mass_destruction/2011/11/21/200-to-1/ID=16851/
Which says - in part.
If the Super Committee failed to come up with an agreement….which now is the case….a "trigger" was to be pulled which automatically began cutting defense and discretionary spending. Despite failure…I can almost guarantee readers that that trigger will not be pulled. Some Senate members have already said that they wouldn't have to abide by the trigger mechanism and suggested they could change any cuts to defense spending through a new congressional vote.
Here's Johnny Mac November 9th…
McCain said he would introduce and support a law to undo the Budget Control Act of 2011, which codified the deal to raise the debt ceiling.
"We'll do everything we can to prevent [the trigger] being implemented," McCain said. "You can't bind future Congresses."
So, there you have it. No deal. No action on the deficit. And that is just fine with me because we should not be cutting government spending anyway, if predictions of economic growth in the U.S for the next five years are anywhere near accurate.
So, there you have it. Let's summarize, Two, or was it three near miss Gov't shutdowns. A super committee that was to make budget cuts that can't do the job. Each party blaming the other, thereby proving that so far as our elected representatives are concerned, the party's needs outweigh the people's needs.
Anyone for some more rounds of the two party system?
How about a president that governs (rules) by executive order and ignores the constitution who cannot be removed because one house of the legislature is controlled by his party?
IMHO we need a third party.