• Please be sure to read the rules and adhere to them. Some banned members have complained that they are not spammers. But they spammed us. Some even tried to redirect our members to other forums. Duh. Be smart. Read the rules and adhere to them and we will all get along just fine. Cheers. :beer: Link to the rules: https://www.forumsforums.com/threads/forum-rules-info.2974/

SHOCKING: Big Win for Trump in Released Letter to Congress

300 H and H

Bronze Member
GOLD Patron
10:18 min.


OfficialACLJ
424K subscribers

Aug 27, 2024 #trump #election #news
Mark Zuckerberg has testified that the Biden-Harris Administration pressured META to censor conservative viewpoints on their platforms. According to Zuckerberg, the Administration's influence led to increased content moderation targeting right-leaning opinions. This revelation has sparked significant controversy, raising concerns about government overreach, freedom of speech, and election interference.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Accountability still 0. Control information, control thought.
I have a feeling the Zuck knows something we don't and is trying to save his own skin. :popcorn:
 

"Trials If Trump Wins" - Zuckerberg EXPOSES Facebook COVID Cover-Up: Is a Whistleblower Next?​

22:01 min.


Valuetainment
Valuetainment
5.87M subscribers



Aug 27, 2024
Mark Zuckerberg addresses claims about Meta's content moderation during the 2020 election, admitting to mistakes and expressing regret over government pressure while also signaling a potential shift in his political stance. The discussion highlights the implications of big tech's influence on free speech and elections.
 
Zuckerberg admitted he censored free speech on request/advice of the Biden Administration.

Big Question;
As an American citizen, what made him think that would be OKAY?
He didn't think it would be okay, he just agreed with it. That is the problem with the left. They will do the wrong thing if they think it helps their side win. They believe the ends justify the means. Censor speech? Sure, if it helps defeat Trump. Use governmental power to go after political rivals? Sure, if it helps defeat Trump. Nominate a candidate for president who hasn't won a primary election? Sure, if it helps defeat Trump. Suspend objective journalism? Sure, if it helps defeat Trump.

And on it goes. They are disgusting.
 
Yet barely a mention of this in the mainstream media or the liberal media, which, when combined, cover the vast majority of the news consumers. So while this is a real victory in principle, it is only a symbolic victory in actuality.
 
Top