• Please be sure to read the rules and adhere to them. Some banned members have complained that they are not spammers. But they spammed us. Some even tried to redirect our members to other forums. Duh. Be smart. Read the rules and adhere to them and we will all get along just fine. Cheers. :beer: Link to the rules: https://www.forumsforums.com/threads/forum-rules-info.2974/

Self-Defense is a Felony in Massachusetts!?!

Melensdad

Jerk in a Hawaiian Shirt & SNOWCAT Moderator
Staff member
Essex County District Attorney’s office has made it clear that they are not supporting your right to self defense.

How could ANYONE live there? Sheep need tending, not HUMANS.

Crime victim still takes it on the chin

By Michael Graham
Friday, January 13, 2012 - Updated 8 hours ago

Here’s the final outcome of the Anthony McKay case:

If you defend your family and property from a knife-wielding druggie in Massachusetts, you’d better be prepared to also defend yourself from the justice system, too.

McKay is the young father who, seeing a local druggie breaking into his truck and stealing the tools he uses to pay the bills, confronted him, subdued him and held him for the police. When the police arrived, they found the bad guy had a knife, a billy club and — thanks to the unarmed McKay — a broken jaw.

Instead of thanking McKay for helping get an armed criminal off the streets, Swampscott officials charged him with a felony. . .

. . .

. . . Thanks to pressure from readers of the Boston Herald and others, McKay will not be prosecuted. But the Essex County District Attorney’s office has made it clear that they are not supporting your right to self defense.

The Lynn Daily Item yesterday reported that the Essex DA insists the decision to nol pros — decline to prosecute — the case does not mean they think the police were wrong in arresting McKay. . .
Follow the link above for the whole, totally insane, story!​
 
It is the same in the UK, and throughout other parts of Europe. But, at least this is a fairly isolated incident. Over in the UK it is a national thing. The householder would be prosecuted for assault, no matter how ‘armed to the teeth’ the intruder was. It’s wrong. Whichever way one looks at this, it’s a crime against law abiding citizens.

Its getting so that the criminals can go where they please, do what they please, and we can do nothing about them because they are protected by the very servants who should be protecting us; the ones that pay their wages, because this druggie sure as heck hasn’t contributed anything to them, or society. But then, its very likely not the fault of those in the front line of law and order; after all, they don’t make the laws, they just carry them out…
 
One more reason why Liberalism is a dangerous form of gov't. You are not allowed to defend yourself. That is the states job. Up here in Vermont, we need no permits to carry handguns and are allowed to shoot to kill if the assailant is inside the house. Guess what? We have some of the lowest crime rates in the country. I wonder why? :whistling:

Don't get me wrong. We still have Libs up here but they know their place when it comes to the Second Amendment and the individual freedom to protect you and yours.
 
It is the same in the UK, and throughout other parts of Europe. But, at least this is a fairly isolated incident. Over in the UK it is a national thing. The householder would be prosecuted for assault, no matter how ‘armed to the teeth’ the intruder was. It’s wrong. Whichever way one looks at this, it’s a crime against law abiding citizens.

Its getting so that the criminals can go where they please, do what they please, and we can do nothing about them because they are protected by the very servants who should be protecting us; the ones that pay their wages, because this druggie sure as heck hasn’t contributed anything to them, or society. But then, its very likely not the fault of those in the front line of law and order; after all, they don’t make the laws, they just carry them out…


But lets not forget that things are changing for the better and more and more cases of self defence in the UK are at long last being treated with common sense.

Ministers are planning to clarify the law on self-defence in England, after a string of cases where home owners have faced prosecution for defending their property.
The arrest of Mr Coley, 72, on suspicion of murder following the death of Gary Mullings, 30, who had broken into his shop in Old Trafford placed the issue back in the national media spotlight.
Last month’s stabbing came just days after the Crown Prosecution Service decided no charges should be brought against householder Peter Flanagan, 59, who was arrested on suspicion of murder after the fatal stabbing of a burglar.
John Bennell, 27, was attacked after he broke into his home in, Pendlebury, Salford, in June.
The incident occurred just a few miles from Mr Coley's store in Old Trafford, Manchester.

The incidents led to calls for the Government to speed up new legislation clarifying the law on self-defence in England.
Kenneth Clarke, the Justice Secretary, had earlier said that householders who used “whatever force necessary” against intruders would not be committing a criminal offence .
David Cameron has also promised that the new Justice Bill would "put beyond doubt that home owners and small shopkeepers who use reasonable force to defend themselves or their properties will not be prosecuted".
Under the current law, home owners who use “reasonable force” – which is no more than is absolutely necessary – to protect themselves against intruders should not be prosecuted.
In late June Mr Clarke spelt out the sort of action that would be permitted under the new regime.
He made clear that it would remain illegal to pursue intruders to attack them or to shoot them as they fled.
Speaking about a person’s right to self-defence in their homes, Mr Clarke said there was "constant doubt" about the issue and the proposed legislation would make this "much clearer".
The Justice Secretary said: "It's quite obvious that people are entitled to use whatever force is necessary to protect themselves and their homes.
"If an old lady finds she has got an 18 year-old burgling her house and she picks up a kitchen knife and sticks it in him, she has not committed a criminal offence and we will make that clear.
“We will make it quite clear you can hit the burglar with the poker if he's in the house and you have a perfect defence when you do so."
He added: “We all know what we mean when we say a person has an absolute right to defend themselves and their home and reasonable force.
"Nobody should prosecute and nobody should ever convict anybody who takes those steps."
Labour said the law was "already clear" and the remarks were a "smokescreen" to hide confusion over sentencing changes.]

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...sters-plan-overhaul-of-self-defence-laws.html

I would not think twice in using full force to protect my loved ones and my property...have done in the past and will do so in the future.
 
Top