'Science' claims "sex" not "gender identity" matter for sports performance

[Melensdad]

Whoa, hold up right there.

This is crazy talk according to the purple hair barista at Starbucks.

Actual scientists, not the "social scientists" or "cultural scientists" who occupy the 'wimins studies' department at woke university, are now claiming that the biological sex actually is a major determining factor in determining high levels of performance in sports.

'Science' Discovers That "Sex Matters" For Sports Performance, Not 'Gender-Identity' | ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

'Science' Discovers That "Sex Matters" For Sports Performance, Not 'Gender-Identity'​

In an earth-shattering, mind-blowing, narrative-destroying new scientific study fromPhDs at King's College, London, researchers found:​

​

"...a sex gap in race times between athletes who identify as non-binary, and that there is no evidence that the gap between biological males and biological females is less for athletes who identify as non-binary."​

In other words - saying you're a girl does not change the fact that you biologically a boy... and that's science.​

​

​

​

Dr John Armstrong, Reader in Financial Mathematics at King's, said:​

​

It is generally accepted that sports performance depends on a mixture of biological and social factors. ​

According to gender-identity theory, gender-identity is much more important than sex in determining almost all outcomes and this should include mass participation sport.​

We did not find a reduction in sex differences in race times with the non-binary category. ​

Thus the data does not support gender-identity theory.​

On the other hand, we did find that within the non-binary category sex was a powerful predictor of race times. ​

Thus the data supports the gender-critical theory that sex matters.​

Even more remarkably, the study found that the trans-athletes were mediocre when considered against their biological sex cohort:​

​

The results also indicate that non-binary athletes may have slower race times than other athletes once sex and age are controlled for.​

The researchers conclude, callously disregarding non-PhDs expert feelings:​

​

Given the lack of empirical evidence supporting gender-identity theory, one should not assume by default that gender-identity is a more powerful explanatory variable than sex. ​

Being an objectively measurable binary variable, sex has considerable explanatory advantages over gender identity.​

Armstrong concluded:​

​

“Gender identity is clearly important to many people, but nevertheless sex matters.​

The 'experts' at King's College have a problem though - other 'experts' with 'science', believe otherwise...​

​

​

 

[chowderman]

I wonder how the big/bad/ugly fallout will be when it becomes factual that males cannot identify as female . . . ?