Hey I'm new here. Looks like a spiffy type of forum!
My name is Anthony, I'm 18 from NYC, I play bass and do web design, umm I love video games and spending time with friends and family (especially my g/f )
Anything else feel free to ask me.
Ok. I can't help it, but
Welcome! Have fun! We certainly do!
Stewart?Hey Smoke, do you happen to be a Stewart fan?
Welcome and heed the advice.. bans DO work on some forums.
Stewart as in Tony=Smoke.Stewart?
and to that statement: Bans can be easily bypassed on any forum system.
Knuckleheads? LOLStewart as in Tony=Smoke.
As to your statement on bypassing a forum system.. yeah.. it's what you young kids and knuckleheads do best when you get booted from a forum.
Behave... mmmkk??Knuckleheads? LOL
and No i'm not a Stewart fan, my username comes from a different meaning and it's not because I smoke pot because I don't.
I feel you challenged the moderator with claiming you could get back in even if you were banned.Umm hey, I ain't the one who's started shit, so don't go pointing fingers at me.
Just depends on what the siggy is, Smoke, ya know?Well you see, I COULD, very easily, so threatening to ban me for something as dumb as having a link in my signature, isn't really a threat.
And so far, I haven't had a good time here and I'm not enjoying my stay because I've had 3 people PM me so far about complete and utter bullshit regarding my signature, I've never once seen a forum that prohibits the content of what a user can or cannot display in their signature aside from the obvious (adult/pornographic material)
Wooo hooray for me then. /sarcasmJust depends on what the siggy is, Smoke, ya know?
Btw.. this isn't your average forum.
You're the youngest member we have here I think.
Well you see, I COULD, very easily, so threatening to ban me for something as dumb as having a link in my signature, isn't really a threat.
And so far, I haven't had a good time here and I'm not enjoying my stay because I've had 3 people PM me so far about complete and utter bullshit regarding my signature, I've never once seen a forum that prohibits the content of what a user can or cannot display in their signature aside from the obvious (adult/pornographic material)
Is there a reason you are making false accusations regarding the legal status of the VB licensing by the owner of this forum?Of course if you are illegally running a copy of vBulletin's software then you don't have access to such modifications in which case, I can understand why this site is completely unmodified and lacks a custom feel.
Well seeing as how many people run vB illegally, and taking notice that this forum has no real custom features or anything added to it, would lead one to believe that the owner of the forum doesn't have proper access to the official modifications site, which nulled forum owners, don't.Is there a reason you are making false accusations regarding the legal status of the VB licensing by the owner of this forum?
I'd really recommend gathering some supporting evidence before you start making that type of accusation.
This one is. Many of us know the owner personally. Hell, a dozen of us spent a day on his boat a couple months ago. The lack of obvious customization of the web site is an incredibly inaccurate method of making the deduction you have.and no accusation is 'false' so to speak.
So because you know the owner personally means his license is legit? Umm no.This one is. Many of us know the owner personally. Hell, a dozen of us spent a day on his boat a couple months ago. The lack of obvious customization of the web site is an incredibly inaccurate method of making the deduction you have.
So because you know the owner personally means his license is legit? Umm no.
I know people personally who use pirated software all the time, that doesn't make it 'legal'.
and I didn't say he was using a illegal copy, I said, the lack of customization could mean that he doesn't have access at vBulletin.org and that one of those reasons could be that he has a nulled copy of vBulletin.
Yeah, because I've seen a bunch of similar sites set up the way this one is (URL wise) and it would turn out that they were all nulled.I'm going to go back to my original question...
Is there a reason you are making false accusations regarding the legal status of the VB licensing by the owner of this forum?
No....those are all arguments in support of your statement. What is the reason for making the statement in the first place?Yeah, because I've seen a bunch of similar sites set up the way this one is (URL wise) and it would turn out that they were all nulled.
it's quite odd having the URL:
forumsforums.com/3_9/
Umm the root directory would've been a better choice...or even
forumsforums.com/boards
Of course you realize that if the owner has a URL like this and it doesn't match the one listed in his members area then the license is null & void until it's changed/matching.
That WAS the reason for the statement. That was one of the first things I noticed.No....those are all arguments in support of your statement. What is the reason for making the statement in the first place?