I found something very interesting.
President Bush took all sorts of flack from people for not sending in the Army/National Guard quick enough to suit the needs of the folks in New Orleans, Biloxi & Mobile. There was univeral hand wringing by many liberal groups, much of the press, etc and all were blaming President Bush. The call seemed pretty universal, but perhaps I misunderstood the call, but it seemed like the call was for the military to come in with aid. Am I correct?
The reason I bring this up is because President Bush asked the Governors over the weekend if we should mobilize the military to have them take charge of disaster rescue and recovery and of the 38 Governors who answered him, 36 responded that the federal government should NOT send in the military under federal order.
Now I admit to NOT knowing the details. I don't know exactly what was proposed. I don't know which governors responded, let alone which responded to the negative, nor do I know which governors did not respond at all. I was listening to a music radio station out of Chicago and it was a 30 second news story at the top of the hour. So if I got the story wrong I'd love to hear the rest of it.
However on the other website, it seems like there were several thread closed down when folks like me suggested that the blame in New Orleans started with the Mayor, then moved up to the Parish officials, then up to the Governor and all were more to blame than President Bush.
Just curious how we can have it both ways? Blame the President when he follows federal law and does not send in the troops without invitation, and then reject his suggestion to federalize future relief
President Bush took all sorts of flack from people for not sending in the Army/National Guard quick enough to suit the needs of the folks in New Orleans, Biloxi & Mobile. There was univeral hand wringing by many liberal groups, much of the press, etc and all were blaming President Bush. The call seemed pretty universal, but perhaps I misunderstood the call, but it seemed like the call was for the military to come in with aid. Am I correct?
The reason I bring this up is because President Bush asked the Governors over the weekend if we should mobilize the military to have them take charge of disaster rescue and recovery and of the 38 Governors who answered him, 36 responded that the federal government should NOT send in the military under federal order.
Now I admit to NOT knowing the details. I don't know exactly what was proposed. I don't know which governors responded, let alone which responded to the negative, nor do I know which governors did not respond at all. I was listening to a music radio station out of Chicago and it was a 30 second news story at the top of the hour. So if I got the story wrong I'd love to hear the rest of it.
However on the other website, it seems like there were several thread closed down when folks like me suggested that the blame in New Orleans started with the Mayor, then moved up to the Parish officials, then up to the Governor and all were more to blame than President Bush.
Just curious how we can have it both ways? Blame the President when he follows federal law and does not send in the troops without invitation, and then reject his suggestion to federalize future relief
