• Please be sure to read the rules and adhere to them. Some banned members have complained that they are not spammers. But they spammed us. Some even tried to redirect our members to other forums. Duh. Be smart. Read the rules and adhere to them and we will all get along just fine. Cheers. :beer: Link to the rules: https://www.forumsforums.com/threads/forum-rules-info.2974/

Disney, SLOWLY learning from mistakes, removes Transgender storyline from cartoon show

Melensdad

Melensdad

Jerk in a Hawaiian Shirt & SNOWCAT Moderator
Staff member
Got to think that Mr Walt Disney would be be happy to know about this.

After a decade plus++ of 'gaying' and 'transing' their story lines, injecting rainbows, gay hand holds, etc in the backstories, they moved them to the forefront, and now, finally, after public pushback, they are reeling back the woke agenda. Not to say they have reformed, they are still pretty darn woke, but it seems like they are making a push for more family friendly, non-woke, content. Glad to see this change back to normalcy.



FULL STORY AT "The Hill" link above ^^^


  • Disney removes transgender storyline from animated series: Reports​

  • Disney reportedly removed a transgender storyline from the upcoming animated series “Win or Lose,” explaining some parents preferred to avoid the topic.
  • The Hollywood Reporter, which first reported the change to the series, cited a Disney spokesperson confirming the removal.
  • “When it comes to animated content for a younger audience, we recognize that many parents would prefer to discuss certain subjects with their children on their own terms and timeline,” a Disney spokesperson said in an emailed statement to The Hill.
  • The removal from “Win or Lose” revolved around the gender identity of a character, with some dialogue lines being changed.
  • The Pixar animated film is described as an original series that “follows the intertwined stories of eight different characters as they each prepare for their big championship softball game” on Disney’s streaming service Disney+. The series will stream on the platform in February.
  • “The series reveals what it actually feels like to be in the shoes of each character — the insecure kids, their helicopter parents, even a lovesick umpire — with incredibly funny, very emotional, and uniquely animated perspectives,” the Disney+ description continues.
  • The reports of the removal come amid backlash against transgender rights, mostly on the right, which President-elect Trump tapped into throughout his campaign against Vice President Harris.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Doc
Disney will lose if it doesn't cease to exhibit gender programing in its cartoons aimed at our young children.

The only sexual thing little boys need to know is that little girls have cuties and girls need to know that little boys never wash behind their ears and bring nothing but trouble.

The girls grow up and eventually are cured, making them safe, pleasant, and interesting creatures to be around. The boys might get older however, they never change.
 
This is how the world has been since Adam and Eve got this humanity things started.
Boys and girls are born innocent and should remain that way until they come of age.

Disney and the radical left should be ashamed, and condemned, for trying to reprogram them.
 
Melensdad said:
Got to think that Mr Walt Disney would be be happy to know about this.

After a decade plus++ of 'gaying' and 'transing' their story lines, injecting rainbows, gay hand holds, etc in the backstories, they moved them to the forefront, and now, finally, after public pushback, they are reeling back the woke agenda. Not to say they have reformed, they are still pretty darn woke, but it seems like they are making a push for more family friendly, non-woke, content. Glad to see this change back to normalcy.



FULL STORY AT "The Hill" link above ^^^


  • Disney removes transgender storyline from animated series: Reports​

  • Disney reportedly removed a transgender storyline from the upcoming animated series “Win or Lose,” explaining some parents preferred to avoid the topic.
  • The Hollywood Reporter, which first reported the change to the series, cited a Disney spokesperson confirming the removal.
  • “When it comes to animated content for a younger audience, we recognize that many parents would prefer to discuss certain subjects with their children on their own terms and timeline,” a Disney spokesperson said in an emailed statement to The Hill.
  • The removal from “Win or Lose” revolved around the gender identity of a character, with some dialogue lines being changed.
  • The Pixar animated film is described as an original series that “follows the intertwined stories of eight different characters as they each prepare for their big championship softball game” on Disney’s streaming service Disney+. The series will stream on the platform in February.
  • “The series reveals what it actually feels like to be in the shoes of each character — the insecure kids, their helicopter parents, even a lovesick umpire — with incredibly funny, very emotional, and uniquely animated perspectives,” the Disney+ description continues.
  • The reports of the removal come amid backlash against transgender rights, mostly on the right, which President-elect Trump tapped into throughout his campaign against Vice President Harris.
Click to expand...
That is very sad that they would do that, it is very good to see diversity in Disney and in shows.
I think diversity in race, body and sexuality is always positive but it is ok to have shows without it too.
 
laulau15 said:
That is very sad that they would do that, it is very good to see diversity in Disney and in shows.
I think diversity in race, body and sexuality is always positive but it is ok to have shows without it too.
Click to expand...
It is absolutely WRONG for Disney to push this on pre-pubescent children. PERIOD. Little kids do not need to be "sexualized" in any way. To suggest that this is a form of "diversity" is simply perverse.
 
Melensdad said:
It is absolutely WRONG for Disney to push this on pre-pubescent children. PERIOD. Little kids do not need to be "sexualized" in any way. To suggest that this is a form of "diversity" is simply perverse.
Click to expand...
You are right in a sense in my opinion, they should not have confusing things pushed on them so young.
But also diversity should be celebrated and questions can be asked by children.
 
laulau15 said:
You are right in a sense in my opinion, they should not have confusing things pushed on them so young.
But also diversity should be celebrated and questions can be asked by children.
Click to expand...
So now just point out every advantage you can think of for diversity.
Then let us tell you why your wrong.
Challenge accepted?

Diversity breeds mediocrity at best and dangerous precedents as well. Just for starters. Why where Boeing jet airplane doors falling off in flight? DEI was the reason. You cannot put idiots into jobs they have no clue about just to add diversity. Boeing has ditched it into the dust bin of history.
 
laulau15 said:
You are right in a sense in my opinion, they should not have confusing things pushed on them so young.
But also diversity should be celebrated and questions can be asked by children.
Click to expand...
Stop apologizing for perverts.

Stop covering up perverted actions.

There are AGE APPROPRIATE topics and we, as adults, need to admit that truth.

My 4 year old son should not see story lines that confuse him. There is enough proof in society not to know that the "trans" epidemic is actually a cultural contagion that is irreparably harming children. Most adolescents (post pubescent ages) go through a period of confusion of some sort, but to push this confusion down into pre-pubescent ages should literally be criminal. And, taking it further, to push it in post pubescent children, who are known to be confused, when combined with permanent life altering drugs and surgeries, is literally criminal mutilation.

Once a person is of legal age, let them do as they so wish. But protect the children from these dangerous ideas. We know a small % of the population is, and always will, be "gay" and that is fine. We also know that the vast majority of those who, as post pubescent children, identify as gay may entertain the idea of "transitioning" but, again, based on actual science, we also know that MOST, like close to 90% of those gays, actually can lead normal happy lives as gays and do not actually want/need/require puberty blockers or radical surgeries.

We also know, again, from science, that people who undergo these 'trans' procedures are not better adjusted. They are not LESS prone to suicide. And we know they REQUIRE constant, life long hormone/testosterone therapy, they face long term surgical infections and issues, they also typically require long term psychological treatment for depression and other maladies.

So if we "follow the science" then we should absolutely STOP this shit from being pushed to CHILDREN.

And you need to stop being a apologist for these perverts.

I would strongly urge you to pick a career that keeps you away from children. Your attitude is harmful to them.
 
Melensdad said:
Stop apologizing for perverts.

Stop covering up perverted actions.

There are AGE APPROPRIATE topics and we, as adults, need to admit that truth.

My 4 year old son should not see story lines that confuse him. There is enough proof in society not to know that the "trans" epidemic is actually a cultural contagion that is irreparably harming children. Most adolescents (post pubescent ages) go through a period of confusion of some sort, but to push this confusion down into pre-pubescent ages should literally be criminal. And, taking it further, to push it in post pubescent children, who are known to be confused, when combined with permanent life altering drugs and surgeries, is literally criminal mutilation.

Once a person is of legal age, let them do as they so wish. But protect the children from these dangerous ideas. We know a small % of the population is, and always will, be "gay" and that is fine. We also know that the vast majority of those who, as post pubescent children, identify as gay may entertain the idea of "transitioning" but, again, based on actual science, we also know that MOST, like close to 90% of those gays, actually can lead normal happy lives as gays and do not actually want/need/require puberty blockers or radical surgeries.

We also know, again, from science, that people who undergo these 'trans' procedures are not better adjusted. They are not LESS prone to suicide. And we know they REQUIRE constant, life long hormone/testosterone therapy, they face long term surgical infections and issues, they also typically require long term psychological treatment for depression and other maladies.

So if we "follow the science" then we should absolutely STOP this shit from being pushed to CHILDREN.

And you need to stop being a apologist for these perverts.

I would strongly urge you to pick a career that keeps you away from children. Your attitude is harmful to them.
Click to expand...
Well said.

It is an unspoken fact that most gay men do not wish to be women. They wish to be gay men.
The same is also true of most gay women.
Which is why the "surgeries" don't help.

So, knowing this, from what stretch of the imagination do the "experts" determine we should surgically alter prepubescent young children?

Stop the madness.
 
The only times diversity is a benefit is when there is a diversity of opinions and ideas and experiences when trying to overcome a problem or come up with new ideas. But this group of people all need to be the best in their field and not just there because they are different from the rest sitting around the table. Diversity solely based on sexual orientation or race or gender is absolutely ludicrous.
 
Kevlar said:
The only times diversity is a benefit is when there is a diversity of opinions and ideas and experiences when trying to overcome a problem or come up with new ideas. But this group of people all need to be the best in their field and not just there because they are different from the rest sitting around the table. Diversity solely based on sexual orientation or race or gender is absolutely ludicrous.
Click to expand...
QUOTED FOR TRUTH
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top