• Please be sure to read the rules and adhere to them. Some banned members have complained that they are not spammers. But they spammed us. Some even tried to redirect our members to other forums. Duh. Be smart. Read the rules and adhere to them and we will all get along just fine. Cheers. :beer: Link to the rules: https://www.forumsforums.com/threads/forum-rules-info.2974/

Diplomat Exposes Benghazi Lies

Danang Sailor

nullius in verba
Taken verbatim from the New York Post:


WASHINGTON — The US diplomat who was second in command in Libya during the fatal attack on the Benghazi consulate fought back tears yesterday when he told lawmakers about his colleagues’ final moments — and said he was “stunned” by administration claims it was sparked by a spontaneous protest.
Gregory Hicks, the first person to testify to Congress who was on the ground in Libya during the fateful night of the Sept. 11, 2012 siege, told a House committee that he was incredulous just five days later when UN Ambassador Susan Rice said on Sunday talk shows that the assault was not a terrorist attack.
09.1n008.Benghazi--300x300.jpg
Reuters
EMOTIONAL: Gregory Hicks, the second in command in Libya at the time of the Benghazi attack, addresses Congress yesterday.


“My jaw dropped,” Hicks said. “I was embarrassed.”
Hicks riveted the audience in a House Oversight and Government Reform Committee hearing room as he recalled the night.
“Shortly after we arrived at the annex, the mortars came in,” Hicks said. “The first was long. It landed actually among the Libyans that escorted our people. They took casualties for us that night.”
“The next three landed on the roof, killing Glen [Doherty] and Tyrone [Woods],” Hicks said, referring to the security operators who died in the attack. “They didn’t know whether any more mortars were going to come in, the accuracy was terribly precise.”
A career State Department diplomat, Hicks also told the panel yesterday that he was warned by upper agency officials not to talk to a congressman investigating the consulate assault — fueling GOP charges that politics were behind the administration’s response.
The order came after he began questioning Obama administration claims that the incident was not a terrorist attack, he said. Hicks got a call from Beth Jones, an acting assistant secretary to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, to stop questioning Washington’s stance that the attack was spurred by a protest, he said.
“I asked her why the ambassador said there was a demonstration when the embassy reported there was an attack,” Hicks said. “The sense I got is that I needed to stop my line of questioning.”
Hicks received another call from Clinton’s counselor and chief of staff, Cheryl Mills, angry that he met with Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah). Mills asked for a full report.
“She was very upset with me,” said Hicks, who said he was eventually demoted after the controversy.
Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) called Hicks’ testimony evidence that Clinton was involved in trying to suppress information.
“This goes right to the person next to Secretary Clinton,” Jordan said.
Former State Department spokesman Philippe Reines yesterday called the allegation untrue.
“Nobody was told to keep Chaffetz from speaking with anyone,” Reines told NBC News. “That’s completely at odds with the cooperative approach the department has taken with Congress.”
Hicks was one of the last people Ambassador Christopher Stevens, who was killed, talked to in a call reporting the attack. Hicks somberly recalled learning about Stevens’ death.
“It was the saddest phone call I’ve ever received in my life,” Hicks said, pausing to hold back his emotions.
Hicks joined Mark Thompson, acting deputy assistant secretary of state for counterterrorism, in telling lawmakers that efforts to get military help to the consulate were rebuffed. Special forces in Tripoli wanting to help were furious, Hicks said.
Democrats ripped into the witnesses, accusing committee Republicans of conducting a “highly partisan” political attack on the Obama administration.
“There is no place or no time that the American military wouldn’t be there to protect American lives if they possibly could get there,” Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) said.
Eric Nordstrom, the third whistle-blower to testify, was the diplomatic security officer and former regional security office in Libya. He blamed the administration for ignoring calls for more security in the country.
“It matters to the American public for whom we served and most importantly, it matters to the friends and family of Ambassador Stevens, Sean Smith, Glen Doherty, Tyrone Wood, who were murdered on Sept. 11,” Nordstrom said.
 
But as usual, the lamestream media, with the notable exception of FNC fails once again to give this story the air time it deserves.

The media, in this country, has simply ceased to exist as anything other than a cheerleading shovel brigade for the shit that the False Prophet dumps on America.
 
Here is a video of the conversation with Congressman Gowdy.
http://conservativevideos.com/2013/...embarrassed-by-blame-placed-on-youtube-video/

Screw the accounts by Susan Rice, the talking heads and the State Dept. Were these the most the most important questions to ask!?!?

I don't think so.

Here is my point, By all accounts from the State Dept and the White House, no one actually knew what was happening. They didn't know the Ambassador was ded alive or captured. Nor did they know when he was killed, or how many others were. Or the status or the time for 8 hours.

So I ask,,,, During that interim from4:06 EDT when they knew of an attack on the consulate......why was not a military team from some special Ops program, on it's way to stabilize the action and recover the Consolate? Lives and rescue are important, but aside from that, with regard to USA lives and/or property, they took NO ACTION AT ALL!

Not from the Military
Not from the State Dept.
Not from the White House.
Not from special OPs
Not from CIA
Not From FBI

This is obscene
At the very least,,,, incompetence
At the very most ,,, deriliction of duty.

And the Media is complicit in this,,,Because, of this glaringly obvious (at least to me) question,,,,they didn't ask.

They still haven't asked.

And neither has anyone else.
 
There was an election to worry about. The effort they put in to hiding the facts speaks volumes and adds fuel to various conspiracy theories flying around.
 
And there's still all the questions about the "security group militia" the State Department hired to protect the Benghazi
compound. (See my "Fox & Henhouse" thread) Heads should roll over that one, and I'm not speaking in some figurative
fashion! We hired an Al-Qaeda linked group to protect our people from Al-Qaeda and seemed shocked that it didn't
work! :hammer:

If they need an executioner for the morons behind all of this, I'm ready. Hanging, firing squad, or beheading - let me
know where and when and I'll be there!

 
There was an election to worry about. The effort they put in to hiding the facts speaks volumes and adds fuel to various conspiracy theories flying around.
Yes they had an agenda. But we can spend years debating that with the unrepentant Obumer crowd.

Screw that!

Without even taking such motivation into account, why has no one asked the simple incrimminating question, Why did the government of the USA not do it's job and send a team to secure the assets, both human and physical?

This is how Iran got hold of hostages back in 78. They took USA lives and property. WE HAVE YET TO RESPOND!

And our credibility, strength and resolve has been questioned ever since.

But surely "we will find out who did this and bring them to justice" Fearless Fosdick said so.
 
Hate to be pessimistic, but I think the most to hope for out of all this is hillary's hopes for a presidential run get dashed. If push comes to shove BO will throw her under the bus.
Mike
 
Far too many people have the False Prophet's six for anything to ever come from this. As stated by mla2fus, the best will be the finishing touches for Billery.
 
Top