• Please be sure to read the rules and adhere to them. Some banned members have complained that they are not spammers. But they spammed us. Some even tried to redirect our members to other forums. Duh. Be smart. Read the rules and adhere to them and we will all get along just fine. Cheers. :beer: Link to the rules: https://www.forumsforums.com/threads/forum-rules-info.2974/

Are 'wind farms' safe for humans? Scottish Gov commissions a study to find out

Melensdad

Jerk in a Hawaiian Shirt & SNOWCAT Moderator
Staff member
Having driven across much of Scotland the sights of the big wind turbines on the pristine hills is somewhat shocking at first, but they are prevalent enough that you soon grow accustom to seeing them. But is it healthy or safe to live close to them?

That same question has come up in my home state of Indiana where we have one of the nations largest wind farms cutting a swath across the north central portion of the state.

The Scottish government has received so many complaints about health that they are now commissioning a study. There are already critics saying the study is not comprehensive enough, but it is at least a moderately wild scale study and may lay to rest, or may increase, the concerns of people who's homes are nearby the giant wind turbines.

http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-...o-Investigate-Health-Effects-of-Wind-Turbines
SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT TO INVESTIGATE HEALTH EFFECTS OF WIND TURBINES

The Scottish government has commissioned a report into the health effects of wind farms at 10 sites across the country, following concerns that many people may be suffering from the effects of infrasound emitted from the turbines.

The Sunday Express reports that campaigners are concerned that the low frequency sounds produced may be causing people living nearby to suffer headaches, nausea, insomnia, dizziness and raised blood pressure.

Andrew Vivers, a former Army captain, said that he has suffered from various symptoms since the Ark Hill wind farm was built near his home in Glamis, Angus. Authorities have so far failed to accept the effects infrasound has on health, he says, despite it being a “known military interrogation aid and weapon”.

“When white noise was disallowed they went on to infrasound. If it is directed at you, you can feel your brain or your body vibrating,” he explained. “With wind turbines, you don’t realise that is what’s happening to you.”

“It is bonkers that infrasound low frequency noise monitoring is not included in any environmental assessments. It should be mandatory before and after turbine erection.”

Explaining the effects the turbines have had on his own health, Mr Vivers added: “I was getting these headaches and dizziness and just not sleeping, but I was putting it all down to all sorts of other things. A couple of times I was walking on the hills around the house with my dogs and got a really bad dizzy spell.

“I actually had to sit down for a few minutes and while I was sitting down wondering what on earth was wrong with me, I did notice the wind was coming straight from the turbines.”

He added that he has also seen an “incredible number” of dead hares on the surrounding moors and believes they have suffered “internal haemorrhaging and death” due to the turbines.

“If this coming winter is going to be anything like the last and with the plans to build a second wind farm much closer to us, I think we’ll have to sell our home and move elsewhere,” he said.

The Scottish government is sending around 2,000 questionnaires to residents living selected wind farms. The survey is being managed by ClimateXChange, who have published information online.

They say:
“The Scottish Government has asked ClimateXChange to manage a research project looking at whether the impacts predicted by developers in documentation submitted with their planning applications are consistent with the impacts experienced once the wind farm is operating.

“The study will examine ten onshore wind farm developments across Scotland, measuring their operational impacts through a combination of field assessments and local resident surveys.

“The project will inform the Scottish Government on the need for guidance to developers of wind farms on how they should measure the potential impacts of their wind farms, and how they should communicate this to planning authorities and those likely to be affected.”

. . . story continues at the link above.
 
Even if they are bad fortunately in the USA there is more non occupied land on which to put the them.

I'm confused by your use of the term "fortunately."

Wind energy costs TWICE as much as Natural Gas or COAL energy. Every 'Wind Farm' in the USA is supported by all sorts of tax subsidies. So basically your tax dollars are going to General Electric, Siemens, Etc to pay them so they will sell you electricity at 'market' rates. It makes no economic sense.

Something that costs $2 to make, is sold to you for $1 plus you pay $1 in extra taxes.

Taken another way, if we eliminate wind farms completely we can cut our costs by the entire amount of the subsidies.




Elwood Indiana is not non occupied land. I can see them from my house.

There is a wind farm that starts close to the IN/IL state line and cuts about 1/2 way across the state. My guess is you are on the east end of that wind farm.
 
I'm confused by your use of the term "fortunately."

Wind energy costs TWICE as much as Natural Gas or COAL energy. Every 'Wind Farm' in the USA is supported by all sorts of tax subsidies. So basically your tax dollars are going to General Electric, Siemens, Etc to pay them so they will sell you electricity at 'market' rates. It makes no economic sense.

Something that costs $2 to make, is sold to you for $1 plus you pay $1 in extra taxes.

Taken another way, if we eliminate wind farms completely we can cut our costs by the entire amount of the subsidies.






There is a wind farm that starts close to the IN/IL state line and cuts about 1/2 way across the state. My guess is you are on the east end of that wind farm.

I was just talking about the "safety" if they are not safe don't put them around people. If they cost to much like you think then you could be right don't have them at all in that case.
 
I was just talking about the "safety" if they are not safe don't put them around people. [If they cost to much like you think then you could be right don't have them at all in that case.

Onshore wind power costs per megawatt are roughly 50% higher than Natural Gas generation costs per megawatt. Offshore wind power is roughly 100% higher than Natural Gas costs per megawatt.

Further, wind power REQUIRES that there be a conventional power plant as a back up for when the wind is not blowing. Wind power is most reliable at night, when electrical demands are the lowest. Wind power is lowest during the day when electrical demands are the highest. IF you factor in the price of the conventional power plant required to back up the wind generation as part of the cost of wind power then the cost is MUCH higher.

Wind power must be subsidized for it to be cost competitive.
 
Onshore wind power costs per megawatt are roughly 50% higher than Natural Gas generation costs per megawatt. Offshore wind power is roughly 100% higher than Natural Gas costs per megawatt.

Further, wind power REQUIRES that there be a conventional power plant as a back up for when the wind is not blowing. Wind power is most reliable at night, when electrical demands are the lowest. Wind power is lowest during the day when electrical demands are the highest. IF you factor in the price of the conventional power plant required to back up the wind generation as part of the cost of wind power then the cost is MUCH higher.

Wind power must be subsidized for it to be cost competitive.

Thanks for the info. I didn't realize that.
 
Top